FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#157111
You forgot 'hit the wall scandal'-the worst one. 2 to 1 i reckon, with 'hit the wall scandal weighing in somewhat heavier.


..? :confused:

Whats so hard to understand about that?


"Hit the wall scandal" is..?
#157113
You forgot 'hit the wall scandal'-the worst one. 2 to 1 i reckon, with 'hit the wall scandal weighing in somewhat heavier.


..? :confused:

Whats so hard to understand about that?


"Hit the wall scandal" is..?

bin in the news a bit lately. Piquet hits the wall and alonso from a poo awful position wins the race. Thought you'd have heard of this :wink:
#157114
You forgot 'hit the wall scandal'-the worst one. 2 to 1 i reckon, with 'hit the wall scandal weighing in somewhat heavier.


..? :confused:

Whats so hard to understand about that?


"Hit the wall scandal" is..?

bin in the news a bit lately. Piquet hits the wall and alonso from a poo awful position wins the race. Thought you'd have heard of this :wink:


I thought you'd refer to it as the commonly-accepted name for it.

However, if Alonso is involved in that, then by your logic Hamilton was just as involved in Spygate. Oh, but wait... :rolleyes:
By Tony_sa
#157118
You forgot 'hit the wall scandal'-the worst one. 2 to 1 i reckon, with 'hit the wall scandal weighing in somewhat heavier.


..? :confused:

Whats so hard to understand about that?


"Hit the wall scandal" is..?

bin in the news a bit lately. Piquet hits the wall and alonso from a poo awful position wins the race. Thought you'd have heard of this :wink:


I thought you'd refer to it as the commonly-accepted name for it.

However, if Alonso is involved in that, then by your logic Hamilton was just as involved in Spygate. Oh, but wait... :rolleyes:


Denthul ,, you going to drive that woman crazy. can't you tell she very stressed ??
#157119
To claim Alonso wasn't involved in the latest "Gate" when it centred around him benefiting to such a degree that he won a race from a previously unimaginable position is dishonest at best.

EDIT. OK so he was "innocent" of having any knowledge of the affair (even though it seems the FIA have known for the past year). it still involves him.
Last edited by Jim Riven on 25 Sep 09, 21:35, edited 1 time in total.
#157121
You forgot 'hit the wall scandal'-the worst one. 2 to 1 i reckon, with 'hit the wall scandal weighing in somewhat heavier.


..? :confused:

Whats so hard to understand about that?


"Hit the wall scandal" is..?

bin in the news a bit lately. Piquet hits the wall and alonso from a poo awful position wins the race. Thought you'd have heard of this :wink:


I thought you'd refer to it as the commonly-accepted name for it.

However, if Alonso is involved in that, then by your logic Hamilton was just as involved in Spygate. Oh, but wait... :rolleyes:


:rofl::rofl: Have you seen Alonso doing his no comment interview on autosport website? :rolleyes:
#157123
To claim Alonso wasn't involved in the latest "Gate" when it centred around him benefiting to such a degree that he won a race from a previously unimaginable position is dishonest at best.

:clap::yes:
#157126
To claim Alonso wasn't involved in the latest "Gate" when it centred around him benefiting to such a degree that he won a race from a previously unimaginable position is dishonest at best.



I'd accept naive but I don't think you can call people dishonest for thinking he may be innocent.
#157128
You forgot 'hit the wall scandal'-the worst one. 2 to 1 i reckon, with 'hit the wall scandal weighing in somewhat heavier.


..? :confused:

Whats so hard to understand about that?


"Hit the wall scandal" is..?

bin in the news a bit lately. Piquet hits the wall and alonso from a poo awful position wins the race. Thought you'd have heard of this :wink:


I thought you'd refer to it as the commonly-accepted name for it.

However, if Alonso is involved in that, then by your logic Hamilton was just as involved in Spygate. Oh, but wait... :rolleyes:


Denthul ,, you going to drive that woman crazy. can't you tell she very stressed ??


She's already crazy. She can't see that Montoya is overweight. :hehe:

To claim Alonso wasn't involved in the latest "Gate" when it centred around him benefiting to such a degree that he won a race from a previously unimaginable position is dishonest at best.

EDIT. OK so he was "innocent" of having any knowledge of the affair (even though it seems the FIA have known for the past year). it still involves him.


Benefiting from something doesn't mean you were part of the plot. Nobody knows whether or not the Ferrari data was used to improve the MP4-22, so who's to say that Hamilton didn't benefit from that? In both cases, it was ruled that the driver wasn't involved. By your own admission, Hamilton was very possibly involved in Spygate ;)

:rofl: :rofl: Have you seen Alonso doing his no comment interview on autosport website? :rolleyes:


Yeah. Your point?
By Tony_sa
#157130
To claim Alonso wasn't involved in the latest "Gate" when it centred around him benefiting to such a degree that he won a race from a previously unimaginable position is dishonest at best.



I'd accept naive but I don't think you can call people dishonest for thinking he may be innocent.


not even naive - thanx Amanda --- you thinking !!
#157132
To claim Alonso wasn't involved in the latest "Gate" when it centred around him benefiting to such a degree that he won a race from a previously unimaginable position is dishonest at best.



I'd accept naive but I don't think you can call people dishonest for thinking he may be innocent.


Innocent or not, as he gained by the action of his team he IS involved.
#157133
You forgot 'hit the wall scandal'-the worst one. 2 to 1 i reckon, with 'hit the wall scandal weighing in somewhat heavier.


..? :confused:

Whats so hard to understand about that?


"Hit the wall scandal" is..?

bin in the news a bit lately. Piquet hits the wall and alonso from a poo awful position wins the race. Thought you'd have heard of this :wink:


I thought you'd refer to it as the commonly-accepted name for it.

However, if Alonso is involved in that, then by your logic Hamilton was just as involved in Spygate. Oh, but wait... :rolleyes:


Denthul ,, you going to drive that woman crazy. can't you tell she very stressed ??


She's already crazy. She can't see that Montoya is overweight. :hehe:

To claim Alonso wasn't involved in the latest "Gate" when it centred around him benefiting to such a degree that he won a race from a previously unimaginable position is dishonest at best.

EDIT. OK so he was "innocent" of having any knowledge of the affair (even though it seems the FIA have known for the past year). it still involves him.


Benefiting from something doesn't mean you were part of the plot. Nobody knows whether or not the Ferrari data was used to improve the MP4-22, so who's to say that Hamilton didn't benefit from that? In both cases, it was ruled that the driver wasn't involved. By your own admission, Hamilton was very possibly involved in Spygate ;)

:rofl: :rofl: Have you seen Alonso doing his no comment interview on autosport website? :rolleyes:


Yeah. Your point?

My point. He knew.He gained.
By Tony_sa
#157137
racechick - have a drink on me - happe 6000th post :drink: now stop the Alonso bashing. it doesnt become you. ONLY hammie deserve that kind a treatment.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!