Okay. So if you cheat on your wife and get away with it you wouldn't do it 3 or 4 more times? If you say no....
Don't hate the player, hate the game 
if Schumacher was smart enough to get away with it then Kudos to him 
otherwise Hammy made an obvious f*** up while they can hear his conversation, that is stupid cheating. But at least Ferrari had the brains not to lose an important team member along the way. McLaren are in a dark and gloomy stage at the moment. But while in comparison Schumi is the dominant driver. I believe Vettel is a more talented driver than Lewis, from the pure fact of he has a crap car and can bring it 1 win and has came 3rd in qually for the 2races. He is doing fantastic and shouldn't have anything took away from him. He is better than Hammy.
Cheating is cheating, In your eyes Schumacher can be forgiven because he had a great career for 12 years, and he was "better at cheating" But you can't consider Hamilton to be a good driver because his team told him to lie and he lied in the start of his 3rd year?
How can you compare MS 12 years against LH 2 ? the only whay I can see to do it is compare MS first 2 years , Hamilton 1 WDC Schumacher 0. Sorry Hamilton wins 
Hey let's compare Active driver's that beat Schumacher....
Alonso: Hamilton was faster in the same car..
Raikonnen: Hamilton beat him in a slower car....
That's my theory now please explain to me how you can come to the conclusion that "Schumacher's a more dominant driver". Vettel's good no doubt but right now his car is faster than Hamilton's.
If you want to stick to your better cheater theory, at least Hamilton's lie didn't put anyone at risk on the race track.
3 - 4 incidents = career of cheating? Failed logic. Schumacher doesn't have to be forgiven for his gimmicks on the track, however it doesn't negate the rest of his career. Might as well argue with a brick wall.
Of course you can make a comparison regardless of the years, it wouldn't be an ACCURATE comparison though depending on who exactly you are a comparing. Using your erroneous logic, no one can exactly be compared, oh we can't compare Senna and Schumacher, Senna did 10 years, and Schumacher 15+, Senna also died, and Schumacher isn't dead! yada yada yada (insert more irrelevant variables here)
As far as I see, and most other people see and the official statistics see. Schumacher is on 7, Hamilton is on 1. You want to create your own rules, go ahead, start your own break-away group, ask FOTA if you could start your new comparisons mechanism.
As for your driver theory, Montoya also beat Schumacher a few times, but that same Montoya was beaten by Barrichello on several occassions, so Barrichello is better than Schumacher now?
Seems like you are running out of points to argue with.
We should be asking you as to how you can come up with your notions of how others are more dominant drivers. Senna didn't win his first championship until 1988. So I guess Hamilton is now also better than Senna!! Oh wow, no one saw this coming, quick get R. Dennis on the line.
I don't think it was my "notion", and I'm happy you see it my way, That was my whole point. How can you possibly compare Hamilton's 2 years to Schumacher's 12 ? You can't, and if I were to believe your Logic and go by the "Official Statistics " . I can take total points over their careers MS 1287 and divided by how many years in F1 (15)
and MS averages 85.8 points a year. If I take LH career points 207 and divide those by how many years he's been in F1 (2) his average is 103.5. Do I think Hamilton is a more dominant driver? I think it's to early to draw that conclusion.
- By darwin dali