FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#233969
F1 has gone back 20 years – Trulli


http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/88848

Jarno Trulli believes Formula 1 has gone back 20 years in the way so many teams view a drivers' funding as more important than his talent.

With the sport no longer dominated by manufacturers - following Honda, BMW and Toyota's departure in recent seasons - F1 has seen a resurgence of independent outfits.

But rather than that being good for the sport, veteran Trulli reckons it has been a detrimental step because the struggle to finance a team means money can speak louder than talent.

"In the last couple of years F1 has taken an ugly turn: contracts are worth less and less, the only thing that interests is the big money brought by various 'little' drivers," Trulli told Gazzetta dello Sport.
"Only four teams can guarantee excellent drivers; as for the rest the level is extremely poor.

"When I started there was a lot of quality because many constructors aimed at having winning drivers. Nowadays many teams' budgets are made of the money brought by the drivers.

"Lotus is the most serious team among the newest entries, but in the event of financial troubles they too would need to find money. Serious as it is, our organisation is small, the marketing department isn't what you'd find in a top team, it's hard to keep going. F1 has gone back 20 years: many small teams and a few constructors."

With the future of Vitantonio Liuzzi uncertain, amid speculation that Force India could drop him for 2011, there is a chance that Trulli could be the only Italian on the grid this year.

Trulli said such an event would be bad for his country – but blames the Italian economy and the fact that Ferrari is dominant in people's psyches as the main issues.

"The CSAI [Italian Motor Racing Commission] can't do so much," he said. "The problems are most of all down to the economy, to our mentality and to Ferrari. Italians only care about Ferrari. Outside Italy, drivers find sponsors in their countries – [Vitaly] Petrov is the latest example - while at home it's a huge struggle."
#233980
F1 has gone back 20 years – Trulli


http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/88848

Jarno Trulli believes Formula 1 has gone back 20 years in the way so many teams view a drivers' funding as more important than his talent.

With the sport no longer dominated by manufacturers - following Honda, BMW and Toyota's departure in recent seasons - F1 has seen a resurgence of independent outfits.

But rather than that being good for the sport, veteran Trulli reckons it has been a detrimental step because the struggle to finance a team means money can speak louder than talent.

"In the last couple of years F1 has taken an ugly turn: contracts are worth less and less, the only thing that interests is the big money brought by various 'little' drivers," Trulli told Gazzetta dello Sport.
"Only four teams can guarantee excellent drivers; as for the rest the level is extremely poor.

"When I started there was a lot of quality because many constructors aimed at having winning drivers. Nowadays many teams' budgets are made of the money brought by the drivers.

"Lotus is the most serious team among the newest entries, but in the event of financial troubles they too would need to find money. Serious as it is, our organisation is small, the marketing department isn't what you'd find in a top team, it's hard to keep going. F1 has gone back 20 years: many small teams and a few constructors."

With the future of Vitantonio Liuzzi uncertain, amid speculation that Force India could drop him for 2011, there is a chance that Trulli could be the only Italian on the grid this year.

Trulli said such an event would be bad for his country – but blames the Italian economy and the fact that Ferrari is dominant in people's psyches as the main issues.

"The CSAI [Italian Motor Racing Commission] can't do so much," he said. "The problems are most of all down to the economy, to our mentality and to Ferrari. Italians only care about Ferrari. Outside Italy, drivers find sponsors in their countries – [Vitaly] Petrov is the latest example - while at home it's a huge struggle."

Budget caps and restrictive rules on variety to reduce research spending, among other imposed economy measures, were intended to address the imbalance which forces 'poorer' teams to feature pay drivers but they're not working so far. When it comes down to it, a business must have an income stream and direct team sponsorships are hard to come by in today's economic climate. It remains to be seen whether the switch from "how good is a driver?" to "how much money can the driver bring to the team?" can sustain sufficient interest for F1 to remain a viable concern.

Still, the injection of a few spare dollars from a certain multimillionaire would solve quite a few financial problems.
#234727
Alonso seems to express a similar sentiment (first part of final paragraph, I CAMBIAMENTI, "The Changes"). Only he's addressing it from the perspective of the increasing technical complexity of the cars, leaving unsaid the fact that that also necessarily means increasing cost.
#234979
Hulkenberg turned down Virgin drive - Weber

ESPNF1:
Nico Hulkenberg's manager Willi Weber has revealed his driver turned down an opportunity to race with Virgin in 2011 and is instead pursuing a Friday testing role with a bigger team.

Hulkenberg lost his Williams race seat to Pastor Maldonado over the winter, but has struggled to find a replacement drive in the current money-orientated driver market. In recent months he has been closely linked to a Friday test drive at Force India, but with the race line-up at the team waiting to be finalised, nothing has been confirmed.

Weber said Hulkenberg was offered Jerome d'Ambrosio's seat at Virgin, but turned it down because there would have been little to gain.

"For someone like Nico, with a season already behind him, there is little to learn from a small team," Weber told Auto Motor und Sport. "There was an offer from Virgin which was very pleasing, but with another German in Timo Glock, who has been there for a while already, the risk was too great."

He added that Hulkenberg would be better off with an established team, even if it is just as a Friday test driver.

"We have been thinking: shall we pause for a year? But in today's world you are too quickly forgotten. So I think it is better for Nico to still have a presence with a good team where at least he can practice on the Fridays. That is the ideal alternative for him."

He added: "Before anything is said officially, I can't say anything myself."

Weber also said he is concerned about the F1's shift towards employing pay drivers.

"F1 needs to be careful about creating a two-class society, with 14 real drivers and ten pay drivers," he said. "In that way, I refuse to pay for a cockpit for Nico. If you do it once, you will always be needing to bring money, and more and more. Very quickly, this becomes your image. Rather, I want to sell performance. This boy is too good to be paying to drive."

It is unclear whether the Virgin offer would have involved Hulkenberg paying for his seat as d'Ambrosio will.
#235170
I find it especially sad that hulk got bumped by pastor. Compare their results when they were team mates hulk dominated with less experience in the same series. Add the fact he had a whole year in f1 it makes a pretty clear statement that money is what mattered
#235174
Thanks for that madbrad. Its all about business and its easy to speak when you're not in the game. These guys are running cars in the most expensive showroom in the world and its no cakewalk.

Ditching a talented driver to keep the team running - no disrespects, sometimes it needs to be done. They can only evolve according to the way the game changes, and for the past decade or more its money money money.

See our F1 related articles too!