FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[racechick]

Mark Hughes's article last week was all about Alonso and his role as pantomime villain. Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed.
In this article he puts Alonso's side of the case. He states the tit for tat actions that occured between Alonso and hamilton at Hungary 07 and the lack of understanding of the tabloid sports editors. He talks about stretching the facts around a preferred perspective. He makes a strong and a fair case for Alonso. He almost has me thinking.........almost

[SennaVille]

Do you have a link to the article, racechick?

Signed,
Sennaville (former Alonso hater grudgingly coming around to the fact that there's a lot of talent hidden under those eyebrows).

[racechick]

I know what you mean about Alonso!.
I can get the online magazine article but dont think I can copy it. You have to subscribe to view it (or be very good at IT ) I'll have a try.

[darwin dali]

Do you have a link to the article, racechick?

Signed,
Sennaville (former Alonso hater grudgingly coming around to the fact that there's a lot of talent hidden under those eyebrows).

[nish2280]

Mark Hughes's article last week was all about Alonso and his role as pantomime villain. Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed.
In this article he puts Alonso's side of the case. He states the tit for tat actions that occured between Alonso and hamilton at Hungary 07 and the lack of understanding of the tabloid sports editors. He talks about stretching the facts around a preferred perspective. He makes a strong and a fair case for Alonso. He almost has me thinking.........almost

Which issue is it? Season Review or december edition.
My January one hasnt arrived yet .

Anyway, even as an autosport subscriber i dont take anything Mark Hughes says seriously. He is the most biased writer at Autosport by a mile.

Please dont assume things such as "Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed."

You really have no idea if they read it or not. Anyone who does read it will know he is genuinly biased and not just because he writes for a british magazine.

[bud]

I laugh, I guess it's because we only know of the English speaking media but to always talk of Bias whether it be British broadcasters, British news writers, British whatever is totally bullpoo! I can assure you the other side of the fence is much much worse! Spanish Media, Italian Media the bias in those fields is retched.

If you dont like British bias then go learn another language, just be prepared for the bias of that nations own.

[vaptin]

I laugh, I guess it's because we only know of the English speaking media but to always talk of Bias whether it be British broadcasters, British news writers, British whatever is totally bullpoo! I can assure you the other side of the fence is much much worse! Spanish Media, Italian Media the bias in those fields is retched.

If you dont like British bias then go learn another language, just be prepared for the bias of that nations own.

Mark Hughes seems to be quite strongly biased to me, I'm just talking about him though, not British journalism in general.

I'd say Andrew Benson (bbc) is excellent. Brundel's quite good as well.

[racechick]

Mark Hughes's article last week was all about Alonso and his role as pantomime villain. Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed.
In this article he puts Alonso's side of the case. He states the tit for tat actions that occured between Alonso and hamilton at Hungary 07 and the lack of understanding of the tabloid sports editors. He talks about stretching the facts around a preferred perspective. He makes a strong and a fair case for Alonso. He almost has me thinking.........almost

Which issue is it? Season Review or december edition.
My January one hasnt arrived yet .

Anyway, even as an autosport subscriber i dont take anything Mark Hughes says seriously. He is the most biased writer at Autosport by a mile.

Please dont assume things such as "Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed."

You really have no idea if they read it or not. Anyone who does read it will know he is genuinly biased and not just because he writes for a british magazine.

"anyone who does read it will know he is genuinely biased" and yet you dont know which issue the article is in??

Its in the isuue December 30th. He writes in favour of Alonso and against that of the British tabloid sports editors. Take that bias however you like.

[spankyham]

Anyone who wants a copy of the article PM me.

[racechick]

Anyone who wants a copy of the article PM me.

Ive downloaded it in pdf form but i dont know what to do next.I cant copy it. I guess thats the intention

[darwin dali]

Anyone who wants a copy of the article PM me.

Ive downloaded it in pdf form but i dont know what to do next.I cant copy it. I guess thats the intention

You could post it as an attachment.

[racechick]

Anyone who wants a copy of the article PM me.

Ive downloaded it in pdf form but i dont know what to do next.I cant copy it. I guess thats the intention

You could post it as an attachment.

I tried emailing it to myself as an attachment to see if I could then fiddle with it..but it wouldn get onto the attachment, I think the whole
magazine issue was trying to get on, its the whole mag ive got downloaded. Further fiddling is required i think

[JackMaster]

I laugh, I guess it's because we only know of the English speaking media but to always talk of Bias whether it be British broadcasters, British news writers, British whatever is totally bullpoo! I can assure you the other side of the fence is much much worse! Spanish Media, Italian Media the bias in those fields is retched.

If you dont like British bias then go learn another language, just be prepared for the bias of that nations own.

Bias in other languages Media doesn’t justify British Media bias. There are us who should try not to be biased.

[JackMaster]

Mark Hughes's article last week was all about Alonso and his role as pantomime villain. Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed.
In this article he puts Alonso's side of the case. He states the tit for tat actions that occured between Alonso and hamilton at Hungary 07 and the lack of understanding of the tabloid sports editors. He talks about stretching the facts around a preferred perspective. He makes a strong and a fair case for Alonso. He almost has me thinking.........almost

I don’t know much about this man but naming Lewis Hamilton best 2010 driver, tell a lot about him. Nevertheless I appreciate that someone from the British Media tells the truth about Alonso.

[nish2280]

Mark Hughes's article last week was all about Alonso and his role as pantomime villain. Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed.
In this article he puts Alonso's side of the case. He states the tit for tat actions that occured between Alonso and hamilton at Hungary 07 and the lack of understanding of the tabloid sports editors. He talks about stretching the facts around a preferred perspective. He makes a strong and a fair case for Alonso. He almost has me thinking.........almost

Which issue is it? Season Review or december edition.
My January one hasnt arrived yet .

Anyway, even as an autosport subscriber i dont take anything Mark Hughes says seriously. He is the most biased writer at Autosport by a mile.

Please dont assume things such as "Ive said before how I admire his writing. Some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says simply because he writes for a British magazine, a bias is assumed."

You really have no idea if they read it or not. Anyone who does read it will know he is genuinly biased and not just because he writes for a british magazine.

"anyone who does read it will know he is genuinely biased" and yet you dont know which issue the article is in??

Its in the isuue December 30th. He writes in favour of Alonso and against that of the British tabloid sports editors. Take that bias however you like.

Sorry for my english, i guess what i was trying to say didnt come off clearly. I mean anyone who reads his articles, not that particular article. This is in the context of you saying "some posters disregard him without ever reading what he says". This infers not just that article but all of his writings, thus i responded with "anyone who reads it (his articles) will know he is..."

Also, on a side note, i think its illegal to republish scans of magazine articles, so for the safety of this site i would suggest you PM it to people who would like to see it.