FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#190956
Hello people

just need some quick general knowledge and insight into the world of F1. I am doing an assignment on it and dont have a clue about the general set up or whatever.

The 2 questions are:

A. Discuss using strategic terminology what is required to be successful in Formula One racing?
B. Critically evaluate why the various Formula 1 teams were successful but failed to sustain their positions and dicsuss what they could have done to address this?

obviously i will ahve to work on the strategic side to it, but if u can provide me with any general information i would really appreciate it.

Dom
#190958
hello mate

Last year that would of been a completely different question to this year. I think the basic rule of F1 strategy is to be the fastest car on the track.
#190960
More info needed as to what you exactly want please, the questions are very vague -

A. You mean race strategies? Or business/financial strategies to ensure good funding etc etc?
B. Short or long term? Eg why teams like Lotus and Brabham gradually declined, or short term ie McLaren going back from '08 to '09...
#190961
Here's some quick answers off the top of my head that may be of use to your assignment;

1. You need good drivers who are prepared to deliver 100%, a hard-working efficient team - all the way from the mechanics, computer boffins to tea boys and the man who sweeps up the factory floor - a car that handles well, turns in nicely, doesn't understeer or oversteer badly, gives the driver confidence to push it to the limit, and whilst power isn't always everything, a solid engine which is reliable, fast and fuel efficient is useful too.

2. An example from Williams' history. After having the best car in 1986 and 1987 - including 2 Constructors Championships and Nelson Piquet as the World Championship winner in 1987 - the team suffered in 1988 when Piquet left for Lotus - a move engineered by the inept Peter Warr to outpsyche Ayrton Senna who in turn was leaving Lotus for McLaren - Sir Frank Williams refused to take on Honda-backed Satoru Nakajima, so Honda ditched them and the team were resigned to using underpowered and unreliable Judd engines. The team also struggled with a hopeless re-active suspension system.

To address this, the team ditched the re-active suspension system at the British GP weekend on a Friday night, the car worked a lot better with a passive suspension for the rest of the year, but nobody was going to beat McLaren's MP4/4 that year. They had also just signed a deal to gain exclusive use of Renault's 3.5 Litre V10, which saw the team return to dominate the 1990's.
#190962
What happened to McLaren during 2000's? They couldn't compete with Ferrari and 2007 was a turnaround, two years in a row they could compete with Ferrari and once won the WDC.
#190963
hi guys

sorry about that

okay so basically dont worry at all about the terminolgy or strategies, the module im doing is Business strategies and i have all the graphs and models etc in my notes, what i need from you guys is more a general overview of a sport i know nothing about. so maybe...

A. what is required to be successful in Formula One racing? (just a general overview or anything you might think is important, race strategies, drivers anything really)

B. short term and long term would be great, like why maybe a team which ruled for years lost there edge?why?could anything have been done to stop that? and even in the short term, what changes season to season?(in regards to who wins)

Jabberwocky u said last year that might have been different, what did u mean?

im really sorry if this is vague but anything will be really appreciated.

Dominic
#190964
What happened to McLaren during 2000's? They couldn't compete with Ferrari and 2007 was a turnaround, two years in a row they could compete with Ferrari and once won the WDC.


I think Hakkinen leaving was part of the problem - although you are forgetting they had by far the best car in '05 and Raikkonen took the title to the wire in '03! In '06 the car wasn't bad, but various circumstances stopped them actually winning a race.


edit - on th actual subject of this thread, i'll rack my brains for a load of points that should hopefully be relevant to what you want, so watch this space. :)
#190966
I was on about race strategies, as the cars where fuelled for a stint of the race, this year the cars start the race with enough (hopefully) fuel to get to the end of the race
#190981
What happened to McLaren during 2000's? They couldn't compete with Ferrari and 2007 was a turnaround, two years in a row they could compete with Ferrari and once won the WDC.


They lost Adrian Newey, think that must have had an influence.
#190998
I'll go for answer A
You need phenomenal talent. A high work rate. Being or engineering being in the right place at the right time(ie a fast car).A strong self belief-you HAVE to believe you are the best. Psychologically strong.

After that you need a team that makes you feel comfortable, a v. good engineer you get on with, an understanding of the technical aspects of the car and an ablity to feed back inmformation to the engineers. Also an ability to be adaptable and change what you do and how you do it to fit with changing conditions.
#191051
Dom,(or any1 else that might no)
Just out of curiosity what strategic strategies did you use for the above questions for your assignment?

I studied this module a few years ago and i dont really see what would be relevant?

Slots
#191052
What happened to McLaren during 2000's? They couldn't compete with Ferrari and 2007 was a turnaround, two years in a row they could compete with Ferrari and once won the WDC.


They lost Adrian Newey, think that must have had an influence.

So they lost Newey and got better ?
#191054
What happened to McLaren during 2000's? They couldn't compete with Ferrari and 2007 was a turnaround, two years in a row they could compete with Ferrari and once won the WDC.


They lost Adrian Newey, think that must have had an influence.

So they lost Newey and got better ?


alot of it was to do with the building of their new facilities and that interfering with their operations. added to poor reliability so even when they had the fastest car ie 05 they threw it all away.

and McLaren were on the ball in most of the 2000s only 06 they didnt win a race but still managed many podiums.
#191056
I'll give A a stab to.

Obviously you need to have top engineers who can design the fastest car and the fastest drivers to drive them. But it's not as simple as that. I'd say fundamentally what you want is a experienced team boss who knows whats what.

First off, you need finances, you can't survive or go anywhere without them. I think the majority of this comes from Sponsors. Obviously winning titles generates a lot of cash but a team would be foolish to rely on this for survival money. F1 is a perilous fast changing sport, so a team needs consistency above all. Sponsors are generally the best way to earn. And to attract sponsors a team has gotta have some sort of brand image, so famous drivers - or ones who are really popular in their home country are useful here. However the commercial demands of f1 must be balanced, this is where a good team boss comes in - they need to be able to woo enough sponsors so that their confident enough to say no to a driver who is useless but brings in large sponsorship.

For your engineers and drivers its not just about technical excellence, they need to be good team players. You need drivers who can identify problems, evaluate new parts in detail and communicate all the characteristics of the car and what they want to improve accurately. The driver has to know what they want, and be specific on how to achieve this - obviously make the car go faster won't be much help to the designers.

This translate into the smaller scale which covers a race weekend, a good driver knows how to set up their car, they know how the car feels under various fuel loads and with the tires available (two options). This means that when it comes down to race stragety, the driver has an advantage. They will know at what stage its best for them to pit and come out driving quickly. Adaptability is also important here, no team is able to have a perfect car all the time, it changes from course to course, corner to corner and at different points during the race and qualifying session. Obviously an experienced driver who knows his car well will be able, to some extent, to pre-empt these changes and have the car setup accordingly. But when problems do occur, a great driver will not only give feedback on how to improve but be able to manage with these problems whilst they last. Not letting the issue affect them physiologically into being more cautious than necessary for example.

The team needs to have good management, management that properly understands what it takes to be quick and succeed in f1. It's of a big advantage if the manager has some sort of f1 background. The management needs to direct all the various elements and try to combine them in the most effective way, this means deciding things such as whether to give each driver equal treatment in equipment, how much the team as a whole should focus on improving the current car and how much the team should focus on designing a car for the next season.

I can throw in examples for the stuff I mentioned if you want.

See our F1 related articles too!