- 12 Mar 07, 17:32#5720
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
BE states that the current system does not reward the winner of the race sufficiently. [no poo!]
“With second place getting 8 points, it is not right that the winner takes only 10,” Ecclestone explained. “For 2008, I will propose a change.” [Uh, yeah, we've known this for years and it was unfair to MS]
Ecclestone has also suggested that the year’s world champion should be decided on number of race wins, rather than points accumulated.
How 'bout counting only the 10 best results for the championship? We had that kind of system before, during AP's time I remember. If there's a tie, the number of victories is the tiebreaker, then the number of second places and so on.
“With second place getting 8 points, it is not right that the winner takes only 10,” Ecclestone explained. “For 2008, I will propose a change.” [Uh, yeah, we've known this for years and it was unfair to MS]
Ecclestone has also suggested that the year’s world champion should be decided on number of race wins, rather than points accumulated.
How 'bout counting only the 10 best results for the championship? We had that kind of system before, during AP's time I remember. If there's a tie, the number of victories is the tiebreaker, then the number of second places and so on.

