FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#173607
Formula 1 should be doing more to embrace the internet and new media platforms rather than trying to focus on protecting its more traditional media channels - which now includes television.

That was one of the clear messages from senior industry figures on the opening day of the Motor Sport Business Forum in Monaco on Wednesday, as discussions began about where the sport should be heading in its post-manufacturer era.

With a wave of new faces set to enter grand prix racing in 2010, on the back of the withdrawal of BMW, Toyota and perhaps Renault, it is clear that that the fresh blood believes F1 should be doing more to prepare itself better for the changing modern media.

There was an almost universal belief that F1 was not moving with the times in engaging with the fans – and should be following the example of the music industry which changed its business structures to embrace the internet and revitalise itself.

Gerard Lopez, the Luxembourg-based businessman who is looking at buying the Renault team, has long championed new media ideas – he was an initial investor in Skype – and he thinks F1 has to wake up to what is going on.

"The teams can bring the sport closer to the audience," he said. "The sport and its environment is going to be forced to change.

"Most of the broadcast contracts are based on a way of looking at things from 15, 20, 25 years ago. The fact is that in three or fours years' time, most people in a lot of countries will be watching it not on TV as we know it today, but over the internet. And that completely redefines how you negotiate contracts and how you distribute content.

"You can't control the internet audience in the same way as you can control the television audience. It's a similar process to what the music industry has gone through in terms of digitising itself. You have to figure out new ways of making money out of it, because at the end of the day that's what keeps the sport alive."

Lotus team principal Tony Fernandes, who worked in the music industry before setting up Air Asia, is equally keen for fresh ideas to move the sport forward.

"I look at the future of where F1 could go if managed correctly," he said. "It is a massive sport that is as yet untapped. We haven't touched the whole world yet, through online.

"I left the music business because it didn't want to embrace the internet, and I was at Time Warner and I said to the people there, if you do not embrace the internet then the music industry will be destroyed. They were more concerned about IBITA – that's earnings before everything you don't like! I left, I quit that day and flew back from New York to London, saw Stelios [of Easyjet] on TV talking about a low cost carrier...

"Everyone thinks I am nuts to go into F1, but there is a massive opportunity there – working with the online properties, and reaching audiences that have never been reached before. There is an opportunity to make it a truly global sport like football. It can be done, and I think that is why we are interested in it."

Neville Wheeler, director of the Cisco Media Solutions Group, thinks that it is important F1 does not just move forward – but does not run the risk of losing out to other sports.

He believes that attempts by Formula One Management to ring fence F1 race rights, and prevent distribution through numerous channels beyond just television, could actually prove to be counter-beneficial for the long term health of the sport.

"The pace of change in social media, and the internet in general, is so fast that unless you're prepared to break away from the shackles of the old way of doing things, you're rapidly left behind," he explained. "You will very quickly find that the people who are passionate fans will seek out and access the content in one way or another.

"The smart organisations are trying to find a way of monetising those rights, rather than trying to create a walled garden to protect them as long as possible. We have to get to a point where the audience immersion, social media and associated technologies are a key component of the way motorsport – and sport in general – is delivered to the global audience."

Lopez actually thinks that the pace of change is now so fast that it will take a new influx of businessmen and media analysts to capitalise on it.

"To most people, the so-called MTV generation is the modern generation," he said. "To us it's not – it's old-fashioned. People don't buy music any more. Kids don't watch television as much as they used to. People consume media in a different way. Even some video game platforms are being forced out of the market by online gaming. Rights holders have to reach their audiences differently.

"It doesn't make sense to try to charge people for something that they will figure out how to get for free. F1 will be available on the internet and you need to be prepared for that. The challenge is not in deciding what you give away for free but in deciding what sort of value you're going to provide on top of that – elements that people are actually willing to pay for."

Peter Harris, the CEO of the iris Sponsorship agency, believes that F1's desire to hold onto its assets is hurting the ability of sponsors to get more fans engaged.

"There are whole new demographic groups out there, digital junkies, and they want to engage with us – using content, building new platforms with their customers and target audiences, but that is something that is quite hard to do with F1," he said.

"There is fantastic content and fantastic stories, but there is not a lot coming out that is accessible for a lot of the brands that are involved. It makes it harder for them to engage with the audiences. But there is a huge appetite – especially with the younger audiences."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/80501


I have to agree. It's something I have wanted to happen for several years now. FOA said at the start of this week that they would like F1 to be on pay per view channels instead of BBC etc... That shall and will never happen otherwise they'll lose many viewers. But introducing it online, that's something that could be done.

Say... a subscription fee of £25 per year. You get to choose coms from various sources, american tv, bbc, radio five live etc etc... you get to change cameras, on board.. you get to listen to driver coms maybe? plus live timing.

I think that would be a great new era of broadcasting F1. Make it available to everyone & anyone. I would happily pay for it. What do you think?
#173620
I agree with the internet is the way forward but I have a few issues with it.

Not all places in the world have high speed internet, or even internet so you would loose them as an audiance.

What would make me want to pay to see 200mph bill boards?

Why should Bernie get more money for doing nothing? (why does the British GP have to pay him 12 million pounds) the teams turn up (does Bernie pay for that?) the teams pay for the cars and the drivers and the crews. What does he do to warrant getting that money?
#173622
I dont mean just on the internet.. but as a secondary option to watching F1.... of course BBC has it live online already.. but maybe the rest of the world would like it. My connection speed is 0.4mb/s (VERY SLOW) and it seems to cope with the BBC live stream of F1 perfectly on the internet.

It's about time F1 and the internet because a bit more connected.
#173630
I offer my services in putting together an online Video Package to FOM for free. Pay for the resources Bernie, and I will make your company tonnes of money just by showing the sport you already have on the internet.
#173633
I offer my services in putting together an online Video Package to FOM for free. Pay for the resources Bernie, and I will make your company tonnes of money just by showing the sport you already have on the internet.


:D I bet there's tonnes of us out there willing to make this happen, C'mon Bernie! the future is the internet!

I also think Forums like this should be set up specifically to tell the FIA our views & what we want F1 to be. Teams have FOTA, Drivers have.. that drivers thingy... the fans don't really get a say in things...
#173640
I dont mean just on the internet.. but as a secondary option to watching F1.... of course BBC has it live online already.. but maybe the rest of the world would like it. My connection speed is 0.4mb/s (VERY SLOW) and it seems to cope with the BBC live stream of F1 perfectly on the internet.

It's about time F1 and the internet because a bit more connected.


I have been to places recently that 400k/s would be a luxury. In fact I stopped using some websites because the pictures on them took far too long to load (2 - 3 minutes a page)

However apart from live timings what extra can be offered?
#173645
NO PAY PER VIEW

I mean, duh. Look what happened Football on Setanta. You'd have to be brain dead to think pay to view TV would work. They need to learn that charging people isn't actually the best way to make money. May sound stupid, but it's true. Like plane flights. They charge less money for you to fly, because they get money for offering you extra stuff like car hire and buying crap during your flight.

Anyways, F1 do need to embrace the internet more. But the stuff pots that run the show still think the internet is witchcraft and run by Pirates.
#173650
They need to embrace the Internet but F1 is mass market product that a lot of people probably wont pay for it or watch unless it's free. They need to start actively selling the rights to air the sport over the Internet in all countries. The companies who pay for the rights must give free access to everyone in the area for where the rights were bought. The companies who do this should easily be able to make the money back in the form of advertisement revenue.
#173656
I keep hearing 'F1 should start using the net' and such, but no solid suggestions as to exactly how, and why the internet is a better option than just offering the additional services (which wouldn't really be much more of a stretch judging by the BBC's coverage this season) on interactive tv, which (certainly in Britain) everyone has or will have soon.
#173665
I hate the idea of pay-per-view but having online streaming is a great idea (there was free streaming on the Formula1.com site in 2008, as I remember watching one race on that site when I was away from home). Internet streaming is a wonderful idea as it's available anywhere as long as you have a broadband connection and access to a computer. And with millions of wi-fi hotspots it's a wonderful resource for people who travel a lot. PPV would kill F1, it's not popular enough to command £15/$25 per month.

See our F1 related articles too!