A differing approach for Manor

Dedicated to technical discussion...
User avatar
McLaren Fan
Posts: 8005
Joined: 24 Jul 07, 11:40
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

A differing approach for Manor

Postby McLaren Fan »

From F1 Live:

Manor is one of the new teams scheduled to join the series next year and according to reports from Autosprint, the Sheffield-based team are taking a differing approach to the construction of its new F1 challenger.

Lead designer Nick Wirth and the team are relying purely on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), rather than the more traditional use of wind tunnels. The first test chassis scheduled to be completed in the next four to five weeks ahead of testing in February.

"We are developing the aerodynamics completely on the computer with the CDF system,” Wirth, the former Simtek Formula One team owner, said. “We won't even spend one day in the wind tunnel, not even for checks."

Wirth went on to explain that individual components are now being manufactured and that crash tests have been successful.

However, he has realistic expectations for 2010 season with the Cosworth-powered challenger, expecting to start at the back of the field before trying to put pressure on the established teams.

Manor has been linked with Richard Branson’s Virgin group and has admitted interest in signing current A1GP champion Adam Carroll.

Earl ALEXANDER
© CAPSIS International


It will be interesting to see how this works.
Image
Ayrton Senna: WDC 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991
McLaren: WCC 1974, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2007
McLaren: WDC 1974, 1976, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2008
User avatar
stonemonkey
Missing Mod
Posts: 6013
Joined: 30 Jul 07, 17:58
Favourite Driver: Bernie
Favourite Team: Connaught
Location: Buried in the tyre wall

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby stonemonkey »

Yep, will be interesting. Reminds me of spaceshipone which was all done with cfd, and that was fairly successful.
To use my phone in the car I deleted all my German contacts, it's now Hans free.
User avatar
Denthúl
Posts: 8005
Joined: 07 Feb 08, 22:01
Favourite Team: Sauber
Location: Bury, United Kingdom

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby Denthúl »

I read about this earlier today and thought that it was an interesting approach. If they get it to work well without wind tunnels, I can see a lot of teams starting to invest more in CFD to cut costs in the wind tunnel area.
Image
User avatar
EwanM
Co-Editor
Posts: 11157
Joined: 21 Oct 07, 20:02
Location: Dear Green Place

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby EwanM »

Denthúl wrote:I read about this earlier today and thought that it was an interesting approach. If they get it to work well without wind tunnels, I can see a lot of teams starting to invest more in CFD to cut costs in the wind tunnel area.


Most teams already are. Eg. Renault.
Forumula One: The World's Greatest Sport
User avatar
Rivelution
Posts: 3638
Joined: 26 Mar 08, 07:12
Favourite Driver: Kimi Raikkonen, Joe Tanto
Location: 'Murica

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby Rivelution »

Acura did the same thing with their LMP1 project.
Image
User avatar
cap-dude
Posts: 2051
Joined: 25 Aug 07, 17:24
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby cap-dude »

hmmm, good luck with that.

Lets just hope they actually make the grid then.
Image
User avatar
JamesD89
Posts: 878
Joined: 27 Aug 09, 17:12
Location: London

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby JamesD89 »

There was a double page spread in F1 Racing, the gist of it being you can't design a car using only one of the windtunnel and CFD approaches.
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby myownalias »

The only reservation I would have with using a computer to calculate aerodynamics is that the program is only as good as the person who programmed it.

I don't believe that a computer is a perfect substitute for having actual airflow over the car that only a wind tunnel can provide!
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias
User avatar
Denthúl
Posts: 8005
Joined: 07 Feb 08, 22:01
Favourite Team: Sauber
Location: Bury, United Kingdom

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby Denthúl »

myownalias wrote:The only reservation I would have with using a computer to calculate aerodynamics is that the program is only as good as the person who programmed it.

I don't believe that a computer is a perfect substitute for having actual airflow over the car that only a wind tunnel can provide!


A correctly-configured wind tunnel, that is. See Renault in 2007 ;)
Image
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby myownalias »

Denthúl wrote:
myownalias wrote:The only reservation I would have with using a computer to calculate aerodynamics is that the program is only as good as the person who programmed it.

I don't believe that a computer is a perfect substitute for having actual airflow over the car that only a wind tunnel can provide!

A correctly-configured wind tunnel, that is. See Renault in 2007 ;)

See aforementioned analogy about computer programs. :P
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias
User avatar
Denthúl
Posts: 8005
Joined: 07 Feb 08, 22:01
Favourite Team: Sauber
Location: Bury, United Kingdom

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby Denthúl »

myownalias wrote:
Denthúl wrote:
myownalias wrote:The only reservation I would have with using a computer to calculate aerodynamics is that the program is only as good as the person who programmed it.

I don't believe that a computer is a perfect substitute for having actual airflow over the car that only a wind tunnel can provide!

A correctly-configured wind tunnel, that is. See Renault in 2007 ;)

See aforementioned analogy about computer programs. :P


I don't know what you're talking about. All mine are perfect. They've never deleted any critical files because I typed a path wrong or anything. :hehe:
Image
User avatar
7UpJordan
Posts: 7368
Joined: 18 Jan 07, 19:49
Location: Yorkshire, UK

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby 7UpJordan »

If only there were more designers like Newey in F1, he still uses the old fashioned methods of the drawing board and pecil before Red Bull do anything with a wind tunnel or computer.
Image
"And Mansell was lucky not to be taken off by that RIDICULOUS bit of driving by Alliot!!" - James Hunt
"AAAAAND into the pitlane..... OHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!" - Murray Walker
autogyro
Posts: 59
Joined: 04 Oct 09, 11:11

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby autogyro »

7UpJordan wrote:If only there were more designers like Newey in F1, he still uses the old fashioned methods of the drawing board and pecil before Red Bull do anything with a wind tunnel or computer.


Exactly, the modern ideas on design slay me.
Nick Wirth has a brilliant computer system it is true, probably the best.
However it is only ever going to be as good as the data base it has.
Many designers have confirmed to me that after the computer work there is a meeting of minds to analyze the results and make decisions.
Let us hope that Nick has engineer/designers who can think out of the box for his sake.
IMO CAD systems are slowly destroying the human brilliance for innovation, shown so often in the past.
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby Jabberwocky »

the problem is that there is only one Newey. I think another problem is that it is down to the communication amongs a design team. If one man designs the whole car he will know why this bit is there and that bit is there. If it is built by commitiee there is gonna be problems and arguments
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
autogyro
Posts: 59
Joined: 04 Oct 09, 11:11

Re: A differing approach for Manor

Postby autogyro »

Jabberwocky wrote:the problem is that there is only one Newey. I think another problem is that it is down to the communication amongs a design team. If one man designs the whole car he will know why this bit is there and that bit is there. If it is built by commitiee there is gonna be problems and arguments


Was that why Adrian left Williams. Patrick was certainly a technical match and there is usualy only one genius.