FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#143758
From F1 Live:

Sebastian Vettel would still have a real chance of winning the 2009 title had F1's points system changed prior to the start of the season.

That is the claim of Bernie Ecclestone, who failed to have his desired 'medals' scoring system introduced this year due to a lack of support by the teams.

To Germany's Auto Bild, the F1 chief executive said that with the current 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 points scoring system, Red Bull's Vettel is "too far behind" to mount a challenge to Jenson Button's 23-point lead in the remaining seven races of 2009.

"If the medals system that I proposed would be in (effect) now, he (Vettel) would still be in the title fight," 78-year-old Ecclestone said.

The Briton's reasoning is that, even if Vettel is unbeaten for the remainder of the season, Button could finish the races in second place and still comfortably be champion.

If the number of wins was the decisive tally, however, Vettel would be trailing Button by a factor of four 'gold medals'.

Ecclestone added: "I think Vettel is capable of five more victories, but with these stupid points (system) it's not going to be enough."

It must be pointed out however that a points systems rewards constancy over the course of a season, with podium positions contributing greatly to the championship campaign.

Under a medals system where only victories count, a driver could become champion with a few wins and no podium positions, while a rival continuously racked up podium finishes but no victories.

23 points currently stand between Button and Vettel with seven races to go. Over the last three races, Button scored nine points while Vettel recorded 18 despite retiring once.

Mark Webber is now 19.5 points behind Button, having scored 24 points over the last three races but only winning once so far this season. Therefore, in Webber's case, the points system sees him as the current runner-up while a medals system would see him far behind despite reaching the podium often.

The championship is far from settled if the Red Bull push can be maintained against the Brawn team.

D.B. © CAPSIS International
Source: GMM


:rolleyes:
#143767
As soon as I clicked on the topic I was expecting to see Bernie kicking up a fuss about his medals idea, and surprise surprise he's trying to bring it in again!

I imagine the teams will all vote against it once again, and Bernie will throw a childish tantrum once again.
#143776
I think the question has always been: what accurately describes the results of the said season? Medals in no way truly describes what went on. I'd actually be in favor of two more points paying positions and a re-weighting of the current 10-8-6 formula. The championship not only determines a winner, but it is an historical benchmark. If you're not going to get a medal, just park the car and save the engine as soon as you're out of it.
#143777
Bernie should just accept he is the only one who likes the idea. Its silly, and would potentially finish the season way before the system now does
#143830
under bernie's rules, Vettel would need to win 5 of the 7 remaining races. Has Bernie actually lost his marbles. That would be an insanely difficult feat, compared to gaining 20 odd points on Button. When Button is losing so many points every race.

Under this system, we have a real battle. Under Bernie's system, Button would almost be guaranteed the title.
#143832
under bernie's rules, Vettel would need to win 5 of the 7 remaining races. Has Bernie actually lost his marbles. That would be an insanely difficult feat, compared to gaining 20 odd points on Button. When Button is losing so many points every race.

Under this system, we have a real battle. Under Bernie's system, Button would almost be guaranteed the title.

:yes:
#143839
This again... talk about flogging a dead horse! A bigger points spread is what is needs; maybe 12, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1, giving drivers a bigger incentive to take the risk of challenging for the lead instead of settling for second place as the difference is only two points currently. But the FIA/Bernie rejected that idea already! I am not a fan of FOTA but sometimes they come up with good ideas among the stupid ones.
#143841
This again... talk about flogging a dead horse! A bigger points spread is what is needs; maybe 12, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1, giving drivers a bigger incentive to take the risk of challenging for the lead instead of settling for second place as the difference is only two points currently. But the FIA/Bernie rejected that idea already! I am not a fan of FOTA but sometimes they come up with good ideas among the stupid ones.

:yes: my preference as well.
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!