FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#77128
From autosport.com:

So, we still don't have a world champion. Regardless of who wins this championship, the fight has had an unusual element in that the two title contenders have blown many more points than any title winner has ever done.

In any normal season the errors of Lewis Hamilton or Felipe Massa and their teams would not have allowed a successful title assault. When searching for the underlying reasons behind this, a fascinating picture of driver/team dynamics emerges.

New kids on the block

Although both Hamilton and Massa have long relationships with their respective teams, their status within them this year is new - and the importance of that cannot be underestimated. Regardless of the size and experience of a team, it's still led by the lead driver, a responsibility that Hamilton has only come to feel for the first time this year.

A team's whole tenor, attitude, energy and morale come, to a very large extent, from the man on the faster side of the garage. Decisions he's making on driving preferences lead a car development process, determine its direction.

But, much as Hamilton has gelled the team and excited it, he's still not fully annealed, hasn't had the fault lines eased out of him by the seasons. In the right circumstances he's absolutely the best driver out there. But there's a neurotic quality about his efforts that, when they get in phase with those of his team, only seem to be amplified.

Massa's situation is similar, in that this has turned out to be the first time the team has looked to him for its lead, although this has really only been the case since Kimi Raikkonen's failure to live up to this role in the second half of the season.

So Massa's stepped forward into the limelight and, impressively for someone in his seventh season, continued to grow, aided immeasurably by his race engineer. Massa's not made as many errors as Hamilton; he messed up in Australia, Malaysia and at Silverstone, Lewis did so in Bahrain, Canada, France, Monza qualifying and at Fuji - and was doubly lucky that his error at Monaco not only did not put him out on the spot but ironically got him onto the perfect strategy for the circumstances that then played out.

Massa has suffered more points loss than Hamilton through things outside of his control - the Hungary win lost to a conrod failure, the team error in the Singapore pitstop and, in general, the Ferrari pit operation does not look as sure-footed as it did in the Schumacher years.

Is there a missing link?

Both camps seem to be missing those whose names must never be mentioned - Nigel Stepney at Ferrari, Fernando Alonso at McLaren. Alonso, had paranoia not ruinedhis relationship with McLaren, could have given it the surety it sometimes lacks.

The contrast between Alonso's and Hamilton's drive at Fuji was instructive. But that's not a fair comparison; we could easily have made Hockenheim the comparison where Hamilton was quite sublime in negating the naffness of his team in a high-pressure moment, whereas Alonso drove like a bull in a china shop. But at Fuji Alonso was perfect, multi-dimensional in a way it's difficult to envisage Raikkonen, Massa or Hamilton being.

There was an unusual situation at Fuji in that the tyre degradation was offsetting the fuel effect almost perfectly, meaning there was no longer the usual positional advantage of staying out longer until a stop than your rival.

As Alonso was asking his crew to short fuel him if necessary in order to get him out of the first stops ahead of Kubica, there was discussion about how that would put him at a disadvantage into the final stops. But Alonso had already registered through the weekend that that wasn't the case here. Doesn't matter, he told them, just get me out ahead here, I can do the rest. Directing his own strategy from the cockpit he was clear, direct - and right. There have been times this season that McLaren could have done with this - but there was never going to be room in that team for both him and Hamilton.

Alonso's got back into the programme these last few races. The petulance that saw him not turning up for debriefs after a race had gone badly has been switched off - and he looks once more like a great champion. His weekend at Fuji, right from how he calculated his pace through Q1 and Q2 and how he peaked, squeezing it all in Q3, way ahead of par, looked brilliantly complete.

But even Alonso has not driven a champion's season - a champion in the sense of his performance given the available equipment. There is only one guy this year who has: Robert Kubica. He's not quite as multi-dimensional as Alonso, his approach while sharing Alonso's native cunning lacks his overview.

Binary is the word that keeps coming back. But there has been absolutely no let up, no backing off and yet no mistakes either - unless you count aquaplaning off at Silverstone a mistake.

He was still in title contention in a BMW after Kimi Raikkonen had dropped out of it. And that says it all.
#77129
A great article and he's right in pretty much everything he said. If Schumacher had thrown away points like that in 2000, for example, Hakkinen would have claimed a third title. I guess it's just good that both teams have been at it rather than one. Though if they hadn't, Kubica wouldn't have been in with a shout of the title last weekend.

What he says about Alonso is also how I feel about the situation. He's a brilliant Formula One driver, but the things that went down last season have somewhat ruined his future chances. He really has to hope that a team like BMW Sauber or Honda can rise to the challenge if Renault don't. Otherwise, he won't have much chance of taking any more titles, and we all know that he's well and truly capable of that. I really do wish last season had been different, because the Alonso/Hamilton pairing was, attitudes and mentalities aside, probably the best we've seen for a while.
#77132
In terms of Alonso, I've begun to wonder how he will be remembered. This is not to say that I think he should retire or is past his sell-by date etc., but it's not an unfair question. By 1990, many people were talking about Senna as the greatest driver of all time. And in sports, tennis, for instance, many people regard Federer as the greatest of all time. (And - completely off-topic - I have to admit to think that both Senna and Federer are the greatest of all time in their respective sports. :yes: ).

It's easiest to use Senna as a benchmark to gauge where Alonso rates. Senna was almost the complete package. He was supremely fast, supremely focused and determined, supreme at overtaking, supreme in wet weather, a supreme test driver and supreme at car setup, and supremely fit (he basically began the practice of Formula One drivers becoming athletes), and his charisma drew the teams' staffs towards him. Senna also had supreme racecraft; but his biggest, and just about only flaw, in my book, was that he allowed his emotions to get the better of him at times, and his racecraft went out the window! Instead of playing the percentage game, very often he would try to win the race outright and go for the occasional overtaking opportunity took quickly. In 1991, it seemed as though Senna had learned that it was sometimes better to finish second, but some instances of going all out, as it were, reared their head again. I guess he learned to control his emotions, but, from time, as was in his nature, things bubbled over.

In comparison, I wouldn't say Alonso is as fast as Senna, but he does well in a number of areas. He's very fit and extremely dedicated. Unlike Senna, though, he doesn't have quite the same transcendent aura about him. Alonso has pulled off some very decent overtaking manoeuvres and does a solid job when conditions are changeable or when it's raining. Alonso does have very good racecraft. He knows when to keep what he has got and when to go for broke. A Latin he is, though, so his tempter tantrums when the pressure starts to build up cause him to make some stupid errors. As yet, Alonso hasn't learned to deal with this aspect of his nature. Off the top of my head, he was in the huff at the beginning of the season with Renault, did let things get to him on at least two Grands Prix last season (when there was really no need to) and in 2006.

So, I wouldn't say that Alonso is better than or equal to Senna - and, let's face it, how many people are going to be? - but he certainly has to be in towards the top bracket of Formula One's world champions.
#77169
Probably the best article I've read all year. I've nothing to add except this from Simon Barnes of The Times:
An enthralling race awaits us. In pole position, we have Hamilton, the cool customer of Shanghai. Just behind him on the grid, and in an identical car, we have Hamilton with the red mists of Fuji. Will this second Hamilton attempt a wacky first-bend manoeuvre and drive them both into the gravel? Or will the first Hamilton let the other pass with a shrug and finish a canny and championship-winning fifth? It's in their hands now.

Says it all really!

    See our F1 related articles too!