About FORUMula1.com
F1 and Motorsport Forums
F1 and Motorsport Forums
darwin_dali wrote:still coolHave to agree.

texasmr2 wrote:That is some cool poo!!! No structural ridgity for crash's and such but it would eliminate the need for 'the jaw's of life' LOL!I love the way you say 'no structural rigidity for crashes and such' in such a fleeting matter, as though it's not an important aspect of car design.

McLaren Fan wrote:Once again you misunderstand me, sound familiar???texasmr2 wrote:That is some cool poo!!! No structural ridgity for crash's and such but it would eliminate the need for 'the jaw's of life' LOL!I love the way you say 'no structural rigidity for crashes and such' in such a fleeting matter, as though it's not an important aspect of car design.
texasmr2 wrote:I know what you meant. I just thought the choice of wording was funny, very dry humour like.McLaren Fan wrote:Once again you misunderstand me, sound familiar???texasmr2 wrote:That is some cool poo!!! No structural ridgity for crash's and such but it would eliminate the need for 'the jaw's of life' LOL!I love the way you say 'no structural rigidity for crashes and such' in such a fleeting matter, as though it's not an important aspect of car design.Just playin bro.
Please allow me to clarify. What I meant was it does not seem to have the SAME structural rigidity, ie subpar, as a stock door would have in an accident.

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Madring was a pretty dull race. I wouldn't mi[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!