FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#14682
From autosport.com:

Montoya not surprised by spy scandal

By Jonathan Noble Friday, September 21st 2007, 06:40 GMT

Juan Pablo Montoya says he is not surprised that Formula One has become embroiled in a major spy scandal, because he thinks everyone has been pushing the rules to the limits in recent years.

The now NASCAR driver, who drove for McLaren in 2005 and 2006, thinks there is nothing out of the ordinary in what McLaren did.

"It's just how Formula One is," said Montoya in an interview with the Associated Press.

"Teams are allowed to bend the rules too much. That's just my personal opinion, but I always felt like people bent the rules and that some teams were allowed to bend the rules more than others. But this? This is crossing the line."

He added: "Someone is always cheating. All the teams have photographers who take pictures of everything on the car. Everybody does it. Here in NASCAR, you have the car right next door to you, you can see it and everything on it.

"But in F1, if someone tried a new wing or something, everyone would go and take pictures of it. A million pictures of the wing at every angle and then they'd put it on the wind tunnel and go try it.

"Everyone copies. It's just the way F1 works. There are so many ways for people to bend the rules."

Despite his feelings about what happened, Montoya does not actually believe that the emails between Fernando Alonso and Pedro de la Rosa that were central to the case were that unusual.

"The crazy thing about the e-mails is they aren't really that big of a deal because you can always find out what everybody else is running," he said. "Somebody will always open their mouth.

"You go for dinner, and somebody will say 'We are running this weight and doing that.' So most of the time you can find out what people are running anyway. And de la Rosa was always like that.

"He would call people and tell them 'We tried this, this and this, and this didn't work.' So he just sent e-mails that said 'We need to try the weight distribution of Ferrari.' But anybody could have found out those numbers without the documents."

When asked about his reaction to the penalties that were handed down against McLaren, Montoya said: "I was surprised by the fine. It was a little high.

"But I gotta say, I was surprised that since they were taking points, they should have taken the driver points, as well. That is crazy, you know, because they took the constructor points but the drivers gained from the knowledge. So if you are going to do it, do it properly."


What he says is correct, and he is not alone. Murrary Walker, Sir Jackie Stewart, Mark Blundel, Martin Brundle, Niki Lauda and others all agree and have said so publically. Although de la Rosa and Alonso were in contact with Coughan (and thus indirectly with Stepney), which is bad, the information they had was not especially offending and by putting it in words all they have done is give the FIA the thread of evidence they were looking for to punish McLaren.

However, saying as Mosley is so adament about fairness in the sport ( :roll: ) and that every team should be producing cars with only their own intellectual property, the whole Formula One circus is going to require a complete overhaul. Infact, all championships as far as now should be declared nulll and void. It's only fair after all.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#14686
'the information they had was not especially offending'

hm, I suspect we only know the tip of the iceberg...
By Lewisfan
#14687
Juan Pablo Montoya is Alonso's good friend. How is he doing in NASCAR anyway? Anyway it's best we put a closure on this subject it's getting boring in my view......
User avatar
By 7UpJordan
#14688
Montoya was just as big if not bigger crybaby than Alonso at times. Montoya should consider himself lucky that he's not racing against Hamilton.
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#14689
'the information they had was not especially offending'

hm, I suspect we only know the tip of the iceberg...

Hmm, only a week or so ago you said words to the effect of the new evidence was hugely damning and went much more further than you expected. Face facts, the transcripts have been released and basically everything is out in the open. McLaren are not guilty of spying; several of their employees are guilty of putting information most others had into words.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#14693
'the information they had was not especially offending'

hm, I suspect we only know the tip of the iceberg...

Hmm, only a week or so ago you said words to the effect of the new evidence was hugely damning and went much more further than you expected. Face facts, the transcripts have been released and basically everything is out in the open. McLaren are not guilty of spying; several of their employees are guilty of putting information most others had into words.


I wonder where that's coming from. It IS hugely damaging and yet I still think we only know the tip of the iceberg. Why do you think RD/McLaren didn't appeal it? Exactly! Because even more would be uncovered in an appeal! McCheaters got away pretty lightly and they know it.
They are guilty of violating the sporting code and of prejudicing the outcome of the championship.
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#14694
'the information they had was not especially offending'

hm, I suspect we only know the tip of the iceberg...

Hmm, only a week or so ago you said words to the effect of the new evidence was hugely damning and went much more further than you expected. Face facts, the transcripts have been released and basically everything is out in the open. McLaren are not guilty of spying; several of their employees are guilty of putting information most others had into words.


I wonder where that's coming from. It IS hugely damaging and yet I still think we only know the tip of the iceberg. Why do you think RD/McLaren didn't appeal it? Exactly! Because even more would be uncovered in an appeal! McCheaters got away pretty lightly and they know it.
They are guilty of violating the sporting code and of prejudicing the outcome of the championship.

Perhaps because they know the FIA had their minds made up about the entire thing and, if they lost the appeal, the sanctions could be worse. I love the way your evidence, portrayed as fact of course, is so circumstantial and/or based on your own very biased, anti-McLaren opinion.
By Lewisfan
#14695
I remember when Ron Dennis really wanted Montoya out is when he wanted to run Nico off the racing track. Montoya is over weight has no talent and he sound's very jealous. He was happy being Kimi's lap dog unlike Lewis. Lewis has taken Montoya's seat and beaten the number 1 driver not even Ron Dennis believe's Lewis will be this good. Alonso at the beginning of the season was happy until he realize that Lewis wasn't going to play second fidder like his ex-team mate. There are some F1 drivers that just turn up on racing day to go around the racing trace and collect their check's and Montoya is one of these people. How many time did that over weight fool crash a McLaren car, 10 times. No team would put up with a overweight loser like Montoya. He would have been the perfect team-mate for Alonso a lap-dog, who just turn up for his pay day. As for Lewis Hamilton, being Ron Dennis favorite I don't believe that for a second, didnt Ron Dennis paid Alonso £76 million for 5 years? Isn't Lewis only getting £500,000 Ron Dennis said at the being of the 07 season he would be happy if Lewis came in 4th or 6th Ron Dennis didn't expect much from Lewis his star was Alonso and it as cost him a arm and leg. £76 Alonso fee for 5 years plus £50 millon for the fine he cost Ron Dennis company £126 million and let's not mention he was BLACK Mailing his boss. Over 1000 men worked at McLaren, but this don't mean a thing to Alonso. Isn't it illegal for team orders? What should Ron Dennis, do to please Alonso? Cut down Lewis engine, so he can only compete with the Ferrari, drivers no worry BMW and Ferrari don't want Alonso.....The only thing Lewis Hamilton, did wrong was be the best Rookie in F1 history. I not going to listen to a over weight loser who become bitter Montoya is a joke and not even worth a mention....... :D:x:x
Last edited by Lewisfan on 21 Sep 07, 22:05, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#14696
What evidence are you talking about? And for what are you looking for evidence in my post?

It's a fact that it was hugely damaging or else they wouldn't have been penalized.
I clearly state that I THINK (thus I label what follows as belonging to the realm of speculation) we haven't seen everything.
And the last paragraph is just to remind you that they were guilty of spying - maybe it wasn't called it in those particular words, but the effect of their actions was the same (and which is expressed in that last paragraph).
User avatar
By darwin dali
#14697
Perhaps because they know the FIA had their minds made up about the entire thing and, if they lost the appeal, the sanctions could be worse. I love the way your evidence, portrayed as fact of course, is so circumstantial and/or based on your own very biased, anti-McLaren opinion.



They KNOW? The FIA HAD?
I love the way your evidence, portrayed as fact of course, is so circumstantial and/or based on your own very biased, anti-FIA and anti-Ferrari opinion.
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#14711
What evidence are you talking about? And for what are you looking for evidence in my post?

It's a fact that it was hugely damaging or else they wouldn't have been penalized.
I clearly state that I THINK (thus I label what follows as belonging to the realm of speculation) we haven't seen everything.
And the last paragraph is just to remind you that they were guilty of spying - maybe it wasn't called it in those particular words, but the effect of their actions was the same (and which is expressed in that last paragraph).

And I have to disagree. You know as well as I do that the FIA are a corrupt organisation. Furthermore, your rhetorical question and the exclamation 'Exactly!' shows you're presenting your opinion as fact. Even in that reply you have blanketed the whole McLaren team and decided upon their motives.

Perhaps because they know the FIA had their minds made up about the entire thing and, if they lost the appeal, the sanctions could be worse. I love the way your evidence, portrayed as fact of course, is so circumstantial and/or based on your own very biased, anti-McLaren opinion.



They KNOW? The FIA HAD?
I love the way your evidence, portrayed as fact of course, is so circumstantial and/or based on your own very biased, anti-FIA and anti-Ferrari opinion.

Do you see the word 'Perhaps'? I'm merely offering you and other readers another take on things. I would like to add my evidence is by no means circumstantial. The FIA and authorities have made political decisions in the past, there are a lot of personal grudges in Formula One (not least between Mosley and Dennis) and there is a lot of money involved in Formula One. You fail to take any of that into account when considering the issue. Let's examine some other facts. The FIA release the punishment before the verdict. The team are thrown out of the constructors' cup but the drivers are allowed to compete. The FIA wanted a speedy trial. Mosley comes out and says that the drivers' championship was left untouched for the benefit of the fans (a euphemism for commerce). On the run-up to the trial, McLaren were penalised for nothing on two occassions (the pitstop saga and the gearbox issue. I've proven on other threads there was nothing with which to penalise McLaren). And, in the aftermath, Mosley comes out to defend Alonso and threatens further punishments on McLaren should they favour Lewis which, again, has no rule. Ferrari's floor is illegal (despite what you tried to prove on the other thread) and they get off scott-free. Finally, according to Murray Walker, Sir Jackie Stewart, Nigel Mansell and Niki Lauda, and others the knowledge McLaren had is something that most people do.

Let's examine what supports your view. The evidence is damning according to yourself, Ferrari and the FIA. All of McLaren tried to cheat to defeat Ferrari because it was the only way they could do it, once again, according to you. It is only the tip of the iceberg according to you.

When you weigh up both opinions I know which one has more gravitas.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#14713
I just pick a few things and address them:


'You know as well as I do that the FIA are a corrupt organisation.'
Uh no. I don't know that for a fact and so don't you - until proven this is called libel.


'Do you see the word 'Perhaps'? I'm merely offering you and other readers another take on things.'

Uh, no. The 'perhaps' doesn't make it less of a statement you make as if it was true. The keywords are 'know' and 'had' - you'd have to use qualifiers for them in order to make them conditional.



'Ferrari's floor is illegal (despite what you tried to prove on the other thread) and they get off scott-free. '

BS! :roll:


'I've proven on other threads there was nothing with which to penalise McLaren). '
No you didn't - well, maybe in your mind you did.


'Finally, according to Murray Walker, Sir Jackie Stewart, Nigel Mansell and Niki Lauda, and others the knowledge McLaren had is something that most people do.'
Oh yeah? BS again! Show me another team that has access to 780 pages of confidential info on a single other competitor. Also, I would surmise that nobody else other than McLaren had knowledge of how the Ferrari floor was designed (not sure about BMW since they had some similar construction that needed to be changed). Most people do? Absolutely not - that's why most technical details have been redacted from the transcripts.


'The evidence is damning according to yourself'
First of all I said damaging and second of all it's according to the WMSC (see verdict).
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#14714
'You know as well as I do that the FIA are a corrupt organisation.'
Uh no. I don't know that for a fact and so don't you - until proven this is called libel.

I've stated my case against them. Somebody less biased and hell-bent against McLaren can clearly see things stack up. Just because it isn't proven in a court of law doesn't mean it's untrue. I suppose you'll tell me what happened betweem Balestre and Senna was not political or what happened to Alonso last year at Monza? :roll:
Oh yeah? BS again! Show me another team that has access to 780 pages of confidential info on a single other competitor. Also, I would surmise that nobody else other than McLaren had knowledge of how the Ferrari floor was designed (not sure about BMW since they had some similar construction that needed to be changed). Most people do? Absolutely not - that's why most technical details have been redacted from the transcripts.


'The evidence is damning according to yourself'
First of all I said damaging and second of all it's according to the WMSC (see verdict).

The 'team'. Try one employee. Add to that two drivers who knew minor information everybody else, probably including the Formula One pit bimbos knew. Furthermore, as soon as McLaren heard the Ferrari floor was illegal, they went straight to the FIA's Charlie Whiting so there was clearly no hidden agenda.

Finally, using the verdict of the FIA/WMSC is completely stupid given the very dubious credibility of the organisation, as outlined before by myself and others.

See our F1 related articles too!