This says it all

This says it all?

Yes - it says it all, there is nothing major untrue or missing or misleading in that article
No - It contains lies and distorts the truth and/or has major omissions, I will post my explanation and leave it at that
Total votes: 7

Posts: 7206
Joined: 21 Apr 12, 21:22
Favourite Driver: Hamiltonian
Favourite Team: HDL
Location: Banned

This says it all

Postby CookinFlat6 »

Under licence from the second coming, this article deserves a thread, and by extension , a poll all on its own.
An emotional topic for some F1 followers remains the engine unfreeze issue, even after the regulations were kept in place by the wishes of most of the teams

This article explains the post season situation as well as anything else I have read. Especially the engine regs situation without getting emotional or adding spin.
So a last poll for 2014

What do the members think after the season when the events are laid out and explained by an expert writer?

The Telegraph wrote:A Formula One season which posed many questions ended with precious few answers. Thank goodness for Lewis Hamilton’s emphatic riposte to the notion that he lacked to the brainpower to thrive in this space-age formula with nearly as many acronyms as text-speak. For the rest, few were laughing out loud after a year which conjured more uncertainty than it put an end to.
In a sport which continues to be laden with doom and gloom, negative headlines coming out of its every orifice, Hamilton is F1’s shining light; a star who transcends motorsport and promotes its virtues across the globe. His popularity is greater than ever before - his victory in the BBC Sports Personality Award should silence those who criticise his tax status for now - and he has become a complete driver.
It seems barmy therefore that when we gathered in Melbourne for the first race, way back in March, his racing intellect was in question. The growing consensus was that his team-mate, Nico Rosberg, would use his academic background, which included an offer to study engineering at Imperial College London, to his advantage. The more cerebral Rosberg would prevail in a formula which required drivers to manage tyres, engines, electrics and so on, so the hypothesis went.
Hamilton was as bemused as many by the suggestion. His argument was proven right. The 29-year-old won 11 races, dominated Rosberg on Sunday afternoons, and, if we are being pedantic, actually used less fuel in races than his foe. The debate around Hamilton is largely over for now. He has matured as a driver and as a man, with perhaps only Fernando Alonso slightly ahead on the grounds of prolonged consistency.
Elsewhere, however, it is difficult to say anything with any great conviction, both about Mercedes rivals and the direction in which the sport is headed. Ferrari are on their third team principal in less than a year, their second chairman of the company, and with two drivers - Sebastian Vettel and Kimi Raikkonen - who both have bruised reputations after being dominated by their respective team-mates in 2014. McLaren are entering the unknown of the Honda era, while Red Bull have been a combination of brilliant on track and boring off it with their repeated complaints about the sport’s rules.

The engines which Christian Horner, Red Bull’s team principal, not to mention his friend, Bernie Ecclestone, continue to rail against moved Formula One out of the ice age at the beginning of 2014. The gas guzzling V8s were ditched in favour of V6s hybrids which are far more efficient and, the manufacturers say, much more relevant to the road cars of the future.
Once the frankly stultifying debate around the noise was dispensed with - the classic in Bahrain put an end to that tiresome argument for a little while - the turbo engines had no detrimental effect on the racing whatsoever. The war of attrition was much less ferocious than expected.
Drivers were not consistently watching their fuel consumption, achieving remarkable top speeds along the way (as fast 225mph in Monza).
Yet the future of these feats of engineering is less clear than ever. When a few of us met Ecclestone in the F1 supremo's office in London recently, he was plotting the return of a normally-aspirated V10. It was not obvious whether Mercedes among others could continue to run their current models alongside this - remarkably, Ecclestone said he would not even ask the German giant about it - or how it would save any money. No wonder cold water was poured on talk of Volkswagen entering Formula One by a senior source at the car company recently.
The fate of the smallest teams is also unknown. At the beginning of the season, it was abundantly obvious that the dramatic rise in engine costs, from around £8 million a year to £25 million, would prove crippling.
Before Marussia and Caterham fell, plans for a cost cap were dropped. Cue political wrangling which persists even in the off-season, with the minnows now attempting to engineer a European Union investigation to force through a clean slate.
Amongst all this, what is the role of the FIA, the governing body after all? Ecclestone cheekily noted earlier this month that Jean Todt’s FIA accepted $40-million-a-year in return for allowing the creation of a committee which can block their ideas and veto their proposals because they were short of cash. “They sold the rights,” Ecclestone said.

The future of Ecclestone himself remains unclear. Wounded, he survived both a High Court judgement and a bribery trial, but he is weaker than ever. The majority shareholders, CVC Capital Partners, are calling the shots now, including on the managed transition to life after Bernie.
Yet, despite all this, do not let the naysayers allow you to believe that Formula One is a basket case. In some respects, the fundamentals of the sport are in rude health. Although overtaking aids still play too big a role, the racing has been superb. Dud races were few and far between.
Thanks largely to Mercedes' relatively hands-off approach, we were treated to a thrilling title duel.
The continuing failure to deliver racing where more than one team can consistently win stands as the major issue. However brilliant the duels in Bahrain, the United States and Brazil were, it is largely unsatisfying knowing that only one of the silver cars can win.
That said, this has been a problem for the sport for decades, and the fact it was largely a two-car race has not dented the enthusiasm with which the 2014 title-race was received. F1 does not need revolution from top to bottom. Instead it requires well-thought out and planned changes rather than its current preference for knee-jerkism.
Only then will it begin to properly answer the many questions it still faces. At least the one surrounding Hamilton is settled. What would Formula One do without him.
2014 Monster 26x Bookie Mugger
2015, 2016 WDC: LH44
What's Burning?
Posts: 21486
Joined: 24 Feb 10, 00:09
Favourite Driver: Lewis Hamilton, Nico Hulkenberg
Favourite Team: Porsche North America, Porsche LMP1

Re: This says it all

Postby What's Burning? »

The truth hurts.
"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...
User avatar
Missing Mod
Posts: 23581
Joined: 03 Aug 07, 11:08
Favourite Driver: Lewis Hamilton
Favourite Team: Mercedes AMG Petronas
Location: Nottinghham UK

Re: This says it all

Postby racechick »

Some great points in that article!!
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Abe Lincoln

Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln
User avatar
The Second Coming
I wanna be spanked
Posts: 700
Joined: 12 May 12, 18:03
Favourite Driver: Who else? Really!
Favourite Team: Mercedes AMG

Re: This says it all

Postby The Second Coming »

Couple of things:
1. There has got to be some limitations as to what our Bernie can buy and sell. I mean, "buying an FIA committee" to get what you want when you want the displeasure and potentially expense of teams is, dear I say it, despicable.

2. We confirmed what we always knew about Lewis, Vettel and Bottas. Lewis is going to be relentless, blindingly quick everywhere, too trusting of others (usually the wrong people) and Champion. Vettel isn't that good when the car isn't perfect for his particular form. Bottas, given a decent car will shine. A serial winner in the making.

What 2014 showed us that was unexpected was how easily and quickly Dan would dust Vettel and send him packing. Tough luck indeed! We also didn't expect the train wreck that is Ferrari. At the beginning of the season we were so enamored with the looming mega fight between Alonso and Kimi that we didn't see just how badly, as a team, the red brigade would ultimately be. Finally, who knew the McLaren Technology Center had a panic room, the sort where they could simply scuttle away an employee for a year...seemingly vanishing off the face of the earth. Not hide nor hair seen of him, only to re-appear in time to hear Ron's voice over the company-wide public address system, "Martin, I say ol chap, you're out on your bottom, this time bare and in the nettles. We've packed it in for you. Do be a good lad and leave your cellie, Mercedes keys and kit with my PA. Ms. Haversham and those two grizzly looking fellows behind you will see you properly to the street. Off you go..."

Roll on 2015...with such fun!
"You must admit, the guy's a bit special!"
Posts: 13126
Joined: 29 Mar 10, 10:05
Favourite Driver: The best in Formula 1.
Favourite Team: BMW DTM
Location: Land of Petronas

Re: This says it all

Postby Hammer278 »

I'm still wondering to this day how Alonso is rated as a 'bloody consistent driver' when he's only had to drive donkey cart the past 7 years or so with no pressure of title worries and what not. Except of course, in that one year when he could've won it by overtaking a Russian rookie in a sh*tbox Lotus/Renault, but didn't.
Breaking News:Lewis Hamilton has officially overtaken The Fonz in race wins. With 88 races less. Lol(Without a specially built blown diffuser, illegal front wing, preferential treatment)