- 29 Oct 14, 18:47#422931
A racing car that does not win, is just art
http://www.roadandtrack.com/go/news/bre ... =soc_fcbks" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A racing car that does not win, is just art
F1 and Motorsport Forums

Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
CookinFlat6 wrote:He is gonna be driving miss monteMy next bit of free killer F1 anaylsis - Hammer must replace Spankee at once
Those new boys at Ferrari arent half sharp, disposed of Monte and Alonso while making it look in the history books like both left because they didnt want to start winning again
thats why I cannot understand the donut move to pay Seb 50mill a year - well I can understand getting him in, on paper it makes the story easier to sell, and it sounds like they are fattening the calf or is that fattening the donkey to cash in on its likely inflated valuation with a public offering before its too late and then use the proceeds to buy another ailing giant, and strip Ferrari of whats actually worth something, stick it in Maserati and then build Maserati to replace Ferrari at the niche end of their portfolio - free money
Them boys are definitely up to something with Ferrari and I doubt the tifosi are gonna enjoy it one little bit
All IMHO ofcourse

myownalias wrote:FIAT are selling 10% of their shares on European and American stock exchanges and the rest is being given to FIAT stock holders, so in summary, it's a money making scheme which actually means nothing in terms of ownership, Ferrari are not being sold.hahaha, are you serious?? a public offering and listing means 10% of the company is outside the company, it also means the remaining 90% thats distributed to the sharehilders can be sold sepreately by them without selling their Fiat shares, It means the majority share in ferrari can now be aqcuired by anyone outside Fiat
It's a click-bait headline!

myownalias wrote:FIAT are selling 10% of their shares on European and American stock exchanges and the rest is being given to FIAT stock holders, so in summary, it's a money making scheme which actually means nothing in terms of ownership, Ferrari are not being sold.Not necessarily. A sale is outright, agreed but a spin off which is what this is, is not just a money making scheme. It's a way to gain value out of an asset that is locked at the moment within FIAT. A good analogy is selling the parts of a car getting you more money than selling the entire car.
It's a click-bait headline!
racechick wrote:Just joking RCyes well done Cookie!
Bang on the money once again
But erwhat hints am supposed to be responding to??


darwin dali wrote:Hm, and what about Maserati? Going to stay with FIAT?They're going to keep Maserati that's for sure, the brand has done nothing but rise and they have massively increased production. It won't be long until they're more profitable and less costly than Ferrari. IMO this is a push by FIAT to get while the getting is good, but once Ferrari has to play by the rules of the regular world because of shareholder obligations the old world order will no longer apply. Montezemolo's exit was a clarion of that.
Ferrari's vehicle sales were down 1 percent to 5,280 supercars during the first nine months while Maserati's volume more than tripled to 26,428 vehicles from 7,548 in the same period the year before. Maserati is getting a big boost from the Ghibli and Quattroporte sedans, FCA said.
CookinFlat6 wrote:Just checking Cookieracechick wrote:Just joking RCyes well done Cookie!
Bang on the money once again
But erwhat hints am supposed to be responding to??
What's Burning? wrote:Maserati are effectively much much more profitable than Ferrari already, as Sergio doesnt have to spunk 200 mill on a mid grid Maserati F1 team in return for brand value locked inside his shares.darwin dali wrote:Hm, and what about Maserati? Going to stay with FIAT?They're going to keep Maserati that's for sure, the brand has done nothing but rise and they have massively increased production. It won't be long until they're more profitable and less costly than Ferrari. IMO this is a push by FIAT to get while the getting is good, but once Ferrari has to play by the rules of the regular world because of shareholder obligations the old world order will no longer apply. Montezemolo's exit was a clarion of that.
EDIT: just did a little digging and...Ferrari's vehicle sales were down 1 percent to 5,280 supercars during the first nine months while Maserati's volume more than tripled to 26,428 vehicles from 7,548 in the same period the year before. Maserati is getting a big boost from the Ghibli and Quattroporte sedans, FCA said.

sagi58 wrote:spanky, you've hit the nail on the head:

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Madring was a pretty dull race. I wouldn't mi[…]
Not sure yet, but it looks that way - Kimi is on[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!