CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Discuss your own car, automotive news and latest supercar launches.
User avatar
darwin dali
Forum Queen
Posts: 26944
Joined: 18 Mar 06, 02:56

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby darwin dali »

Record cold, lake effect snow, brutal winters with ice and loads of salt, the works. Probably not as cold as fooking Toronto from where we get those cold spells, but brutally cold enough :banghead:
Image Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. Image
User avatar
sagi58
Posts: 10203
Joined: 23 Jul 13, 22:05
Favourite Driver: He Who Drives for Ferrari!!
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: 5 miles North of "X"!

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby sagi58 »

:rofl:

Next question: if you only get a car wash 3 times a year,
do you actually drive it, for it to get dirty? :P
ImageAfter the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
User avatar
darwin dali
Forum Queen
Posts: 26944
Joined: 18 Mar 06, 02:56

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby darwin dali »

sagi58 wrote::rofl:

Next question: if you only get a car wash 3 times a year,
do you actually drive it, for it to get dirty? :P

Yes, and it gets dirty within 10 minutes around here :P
Image Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. Image
User avatar
sagi58
Posts: 10203
Joined: 23 Jul 13, 22:05
Favourite Driver: He Who Drives for Ferrari!!
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: 5 miles North of "X"!

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby sagi58 »

darwin dali wrote:
sagi58 wrote::rofl:

Next question: if you only get a car wash 3 times a year,
do you actually drive it, for it to get dirty? :P

Yes, and it gets dirty within 10 minutes around here :P

Sounds familiar!! :thumbup:
ImageAfter the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
User avatar
sagi58
Posts: 10203
Joined: 23 Jul 13, 22:05
Favourite Driver: He Who Drives for Ferrari!!
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: 5 miles North of "X"!

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby sagi58 »

gdh wrote:Sagi58, after spending a full winter with your Fit how do you like it and the cvt? Our son is looking to buy one this spring or summer.

You will never guess how many clicks I got on a full tank of gas!!
So... you know what gas prices are, right? The other day I paid
$.999 per litre and filled up my tank for $35.00!! I drove it about
10 days until there were only fumes in the tank... 500 km!!
That's both city and highway driving!!
ImageAfter the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby myownalias »

sagi58 wrote:
gdh wrote:Sagi58, after spending a full winter with your Fit how do you like it and the cvt? Our son is looking to buy one this spring or summer.

You will never guess how many clicks I got on a full tank of gas!!
So... you know what gas prices are, right? The other day I paid
$.999 per litre and filled up my tank for $35.00!! I drove it about
10 days until there were only fumes in the tank... 500 km!!
That's both city and highway driving!!

I thought it would be more than that, I get around 350 miles (560km) on a full tank combined highway/city, roughly about US$32 at the pump and I have a 3 liter V6 engine and a lead foot, although I do have a 16 gallon fuel tank, I would assume the Fit has a smaller tank?
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias
User avatar
oaba09
Posts: 521
Joined: 06 Apr 10, 11:54
Favourite Driver: I'm more of a team supporter
Favourite Team: Mclaren(doesn't matter who the drivers are)
Location: Valenzuela, Philippines

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby oaba09 »

I have been driving a cvt car for almost 2 years now. So far, I haven't encountered any problems. The fuel efficiency is amazing. I used to drive an automatic and Im spending 35% less on fuel after changing to a cvt car...
User avatar
Stephen
Site Admin
Posts: 2198
Joined: 24 Sep 05, 12:47
Favourite Driver: Kimi Raikkonen
Favourite Team: McLaren

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby Stephen »

3double8 wrote:I do dream of mastering a stick shift. (I like to challenge myself with stuff that chaps think they're unbeatable at)
Problem (or not) is Kampala, Uganda is blessed with so many hills and the traffic is madness (seriously, if you can drive in this city, you can drive ANYWHERE) so the whole balancing and shifting up to 3rd gear at most pretty much grinds my gears.


That sounds like a challenge! :eek:

When sitting in traffic I don't mind using an automatic but when you find some decent back-roads with no traffic the manual becomes preferable. My Volvo has an automatic box but with a manual option - you'd think best of both Worlds but somehow the designers have found the worst of both!

oaba09 wrote:I have been driving a cvt car for almost 2 years now. So far, I haven't encountered any problems. The fuel efficiency is amazing. I used to drive an automatic and Im spending 35% less on fuel after changing to a cvt car...


35% - that is impressive! :thumbup:
User avatar
sagi58
Posts: 10203
Joined: 23 Jul 13, 22:05
Favourite Driver: He Who Drives for Ferrari!!
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: 5 miles North of "X"!

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby sagi58 »

myownalias wrote:
sagi58 wrote:
gdh wrote:Sagi58, after spending a full winter with your Fit how do you like it and the cvt? Our son is looking to buy one this spring or summer.

You will never guess how many clicks I got on a full tank of gas!!
So... you know what gas prices are, right? The other day I paid
$.999 per litre and filled up my tank for $35.00!! I drove it about
10 days until there were only fumes in the tank... 500 km!!
That's both city and highway driving!!

I thought it would be more than that, I get around 350 miles (560km) on a full tank combined highway/city, roughly about US$32 at the pump and I have a 3 liter V6 engine and a lead foot, although I do have a 16 gallon fuel tank, I would assume the Fit has a smaller tank?


It is smaller!! Since I can get 35 L, that converts into about 9 U.S. gallons!
Let's see... 560km/16 gallons = approx. 35 km to the gallon for you, and...
500 km/9 U.S. gallons = approx. 55 km to the U.S. gallon for me!! :wink:
ImageAfter the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby myownalias »

oaba09 wrote:I have been driving a cvt car for almost 2 years now. So far, I haven't encountered any problems. The fuel efficiency is amazing. I used to drive an automatic and Im spending 35% less on fuel after changing to a cvt car...

There has to be more going on than just switching to a CVT, a CVT transmission wouldn't save that much fuel alone, I'm thinking you have a smaller, more efficient engine than before as well to achieve those numbers.

sagi58 wrote:It is smaller!! Since I can get 35 L, that converts into about 9 U.S. gallons!
Let's see... 560km/16 gallons = approx. 35 km to the gallon for you, and...
500 km/9 U.S. gallons = approx. 55 km to the U.S. gallon for me!! :wink:

So you get better MPG than me, which is not surprising, but I would not give up my standard auto for a CVT (although a full manual would be nice) and I don't really like eco-boxes, in the US fuel is cheap enough to not need an eco-box like many European countries and Canada it seems.
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias
User avatar
oaba09
Posts: 521
Joined: 06 Apr 10, 11:54
Favourite Driver: I'm more of a team supporter
Favourite Team: Mclaren(doesn't matter who the drivers are)
Location: Valenzuela, Philippines

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby oaba09 »

myownalias wrote:
oaba09 wrote:I have been driving a cvt car for almost 2 years now. So far, I haven't encountered any problems. The fuel efficiency is amazing. I used to drive an automatic and Im spending 35% less on fuel after changing to a cvt car...

There has to be more going on than just switching to a CVT, a CVT transmission wouldn't save that much fuel alone, I'm thinking you have a smaller, more efficient engine than before as well to achieve those numbers.

sagi58 wrote:It is smaller!! Since I can get 35 L, that converts into about 9 U.S. gallons!
Let's see... 560km/16 gallons = approx. 35 km to the gallon for you, and...
500 km/9 U.S. gallons = approx. 55 km to the U.S. gallon for me!! :wink:

So you get better MPG than me, which is not surprising, but I would not give up my standard auto for a CVT (although a full manual would be nice) and I don't really like eco-boxes, in the US fuel is cheap enough to not need an eco-box like many European countries and Canada it seems.

Yeah. The cvt contributed but I do admit that Im driving a much more efficient car. I highly value fuel efficiency over style.
User avatar
sagi58
Posts: 10203
Joined: 23 Jul 13, 22:05
Favourite Driver: He Who Drives for Ferrari!!
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: 5 miles North of "X"!

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby sagi58 »

myownalias wrote:
sagi58 wrote:It is smaller!! Since I can get 35 L, that converts into about 9 U.S. gallons!
Let's see... 560km/16 gallons = approx. 35 km to the gallon for you, and...
500 km/9 U.S. gallons = approx. 55 km to the U.S. gallon for me!! :wink:

So you get better MPG than me, which is not surprising, but I would not give up my standard auto for a CVT (although a full manual would be nice) and I don't really like eco-boxes, in the US fuel is cheap enough to not need an eco-box like many European countries and Canada it seems.


And, you couldn't pay me enough to take on a standard/manual transmission! :nono:
Not to mention I don't like driving my living room around on four wheels. :P
ImageAfter the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby myownalias »

sagi58 wrote:Not to mention I don't like driving my living room around on four wheels. :P

How big do you think my car is? I could fit my car in my living room four times over...

But I have to admit that if I was in Europe still, I would probably have a little 1.6L Turbo (with stick shift) to save on fuel!
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias
User avatar
sagi58
Posts: 10203
Joined: 23 Jul 13, 22:05
Favourite Driver: He Who Drives for Ferrari!!
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: 5 miles North of "X"!

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby sagi58 »

myownalias wrote:
sagi58 wrote:Not to mention I don't like driving my living room around on four wheels. :P

How big do you think my car is? I could fit my car in my living room four times over...

How big is your living room? :yikes:

p.s. I've forgotten what you're driving!! :blush:
ImageAfter the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: CVT or standard auto/manual transmission?

Postby myownalias »

sagi58 wrote:
myownalias wrote:
sagi58 wrote:Not to mention I don't like driving my living room around on four wheels. :P

How big do you think my car is? I could fit my car in my living room four times over...

How big is your living room? :yikes:

p.s. I've forgotten what you're driving!! :blush:

OK, so I can only fit the car in the living room three times over, the room is 22ft x 16ft. I drive a 2012 Ford Fusion.

Image
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias