50 day poll. Vote away!

You can all vote option 5 to vent....but vote another too! You have 2 options. I AM genuinely curious reg this topic.
acosmichippo wrote:I did purely judging from past performance (especially regarding tires) and the departure of Brawn. I understand that 2014 is a whole different animal, but I don't see enough changing for them to make the jump to championships.
CookinFlat6 wrote:Who voted 'Most likely no' and why? would be good to hear the reasoning behind this choice
operaman wrote:CookinFlat6 wrote:Who voted 'Most likely no' and why? would be good to hear the reasoning behind this choice
Simple. Until some team demonstrates that they can match Red Bull's ability to make the most of whatever rule-set is put before them and react to challenges through in-season development, I see no reason to doubt their ability to repeat.
operaman wrote:Much of their success may be due to their seemingly unlimited budget, something that remains a constant in this season of change. I also think the challenges they face are lesser than the other major teams. Their focus is on designing a chassis to suit one driver, around which the team is built and has been for several years.
operaman wrote:The fact that they do not have to worry about designing an engine (some see this as a disadvantage) as well, is another plus. After all their engines are supplied by Renault, who are no doubt eager to continue their dominance. After all who has more experience with turbos?
operaman wrote:Last, but not least .. the addition of Riccardo is an upgrade, not because he is a better driver than Webbo, but because he will be less of distraction. Red Bull will be for 2014 at least, a team united in purpose, with a massive budget and all the right players to make the most of it.
Now 2015 ... that may be a different story.
spankyham wrote:I haven't voted simply because we have no idea what each team has produced. As operaman says, until someone proves they have better performance, you have to stick with Red Bull as the front runners.
Jabberwocky wrote:As everyone seems to say that historically Mercedes was 2nd last year, look what happened the last time Brackley produces a title contender car. The following year (The W01) was poor. However that time they had depleted their design work force, where as this time they have enough technical directors to carry out a pitstop.
As for Brawn leaving, I think how the whole season goes for Mercedes will be a domino effect of testing and maybe the first few races. I think everything will go swimmingly until they hit a problem. It will be at that point will we see how the new management structure copes without Brawn being at the head of the beast. So they will either gel and bring the car forward or fall into civil war.
spankyham wrote:Honestly I place very little credence on these purported requests as we have no idea of the context they were placed in and, we know half the time teams make these requests as red herrings or to throw other teams off.
As I said previously we just don't know. So, for me, I'll just wait to see some concrete evidence before making a judgement about who will be winning championships this year.