- 04 Jun 11, 07:20#259260Another sterling example of the FIA talking out both sides of its face. Half the regs in the TR were created in the name of cost control. Unless the sponsors all agree to pony up an extra 5% to cover the additional weekend, how in the name of Nikolaus Otto does 21 races jive with Bernie's austerity edict? And what's the point of mandating higher fuel efficiency (or increasing the percentage of organic whatever in it) if you then turn around and race on more weekends. If you're really trying to save the planet (for the record, it does not need saving), why aren't you scheduling fewer race weekends, not more?
As for the schedule itself, I think the teams are too harried when there are races on consecutive weekends. That leaves only four days (or three in the case of Monaco) to get the circus packed up, moved across the continent, unpacked and be ready to put on a proper show. How can you possibly give your team any time off with such a tight schedule? A couple or three such races over the course of a season is one thing but I don't think they can stay wound that tight 37 weeks without performance dropping off or amphetamine use skyrocketing.
The teams obviously are going to crap a brick over this bit of news. It's almost like the FIA are becoming all the more adversarial with the intent of driving the teams to seek their independence.
"I'll bet ya a hundred and five thousand dollars you go to sleep before I do."
--Dobbsie