FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#74899
No because Lewis Hamilton isn't the greatest driver ever and never will be. That honour (Spelling Honor) belongs to one man and his name is Michael Schumacher. That record will never ever be beaten by the likes of inferior to Schumacher, Lewis Hamilton.


Although I was joking around with the loose/lose thing and I know you did a typo as I did with orded (Which I wrote ordered) you have stuffed up with the honour/honor thing. Take a look below.

Honor or Honour (see spelling differences), (from the Latin word honos, honoris) is the evaluation of a person's trustworthiness and social status based on that individual's espousals and actions. Honour is deemed exactly what determines a person's character: whether or not the person reflects honesty, respect, integrity, or fairness.

That was an abstract from Wikipedia. I never spelt honour or like you want to spell it honor wrong?

I wrote it the British way and you wrote it the American way. Given you are British, I think you have done a big boo boo for telling me the British spelling is wrong!


i don't care i'm dyslexic i can't spell to save my life.

just funny to see you going off on one.
#74902
No because Lewis Hamilton isn't the greatest driver ever and never will be. That honour (Spelling Honor) belongs to one man and his name is Michael Schumacher. That record will never ever be beaten by the likes of inferior to Schumacher, Lewis Hamilton.


Although I was joking around with the loose/lose thing and I know you did a typo as I did with orded (Which I wrote ordered) you have stuffed up with the honour/honor thing. Take a look below.

Honor or Honour (see spelling differences), (from the Latin word honos, honoris) is the evaluation of a person's trustworthiness and social status based on that individual's espousals and actions. Honour is deemed exactly what determines a person's character: whether or not the person reflects honesty, respect, integrity, or fairness.

That was an abstract from Wikipedia. I never spelt honour or like you want to spell it honor wrong?

I wrote it the British way and you wrote it the American way. Given you are British, I think you have done a big boo boo for telling me the British spelling is wrong!


i don't care i'm dyslexic i can't spell to save my life.

just funny to see you going off on one.


I was just being a little smart arse regarding the "loose" word. Just like you were about your jokes. I know it was an accident. I make a million typos all the time. All our jokes I take are in good faith? Although with the spelling you should care. I am a "Linguistics" person and although I have learnt that the English language is flawed in many ways, the way I see it is if one wants to speak it or write it in this case, then do it correctly according to the grammar. Even if it sucks. Just my opinion, no foul ideas intended, k?
#74904
No because Lewis Hamilton isn't the greatest driver ever and never will be. That honour (Spelling Honor) belongs to one man and his name is Michael Schumacher. That record will never ever be beaten by the likes of inferior to Schumacher, Lewis Hamilton.


Although I was joking around with the loose/lose thing and I know you did a typo as I did with orded (Which I wrote ordered) you have stuffed up with the honour/honor thing. Take a look below.

Honor or Honour (see spelling differences), (from the Latin word honos, honoris) is the evaluation of a person's trustworthiness and social status based on that individual's espousals and actions. Honour is deemed exactly what determines a person's character: whether or not the person reflects honesty, respect, integrity, or fairness.

That was an abstract from Wikipedia. I never spelt honour or like you want to spell it honor wrong?

I wrote it the British way and you wrote it the American way. Given you are British, I think you have done a big boo boo for telling me the British spelling is wrong!


i don't care i'm dyslexic i can't spell to save my life.

just funny to see you going off on one.


I was just being a little smart arse regarding the "loose" word. Just like you were about your jokes. I know it was an accident. I make a million typos all the time. All our jokes I take are in good faith? Although with the spelling you should care. I am a "Linguistics" person and although I have learnt that the English language is flawed in many ways, the way I see it is if one wants to speak it or write it in this case, then do it correctly according to the grammar. Even if it sucks. Just my opinion, no foul ideas intended, k?


Yeh no worries i'm was just joking too.

no offense taken.
#74911
What was this thread about now?


Yes sorry, it was about if Kimi crashes with Lewis Hamilton in Brazil. I just realised oops realized now that I have gone off topic. :D
#74935
If Raikkonen intentionally crashes into Lewis I would expect McLaren to have ordered Kovalainen to wipe out Massa. You wouldn't see any complaints from any but the most biased Ferrari lambs.

Man that would be crazy wouldn't it? :eek:
#74940
If Raikkonen intentionally crashes into Lewis I would expect McLaren to have ordered Kovalainen to wipe out Massa. You wouldn't see any complaints from any but the most biased Ferrari lambs.


do you reacon Kovi could catch massa?
#74959
however i can't see it happening really, Raikkonen isn't that type of driver imo.


Aye, I don't think he is either. JPM might have a couple of colourful things to say about KR though. :D I miss that fat crazy guy.



Oooh, you're gonna get SO in trouble with racechick for calling Mr. Chubby fat :P


:yellowyikes: Yes he so is in trouble!!! Crazy guy, yep, FAT!! NO!!! And I miss him loads and loads!! Mardy-arse baby racers we have now, most of them, with exceptions of course.
#75021
If Raikkonen intentionally crashes into Lewis I would expect McLaren to have ordered Kovalainen to wipe out Massa. You wouldn't see any complaints from any but the most biased Ferrari lambs.


You'd hear complaints from me. Two wrongs certainly don't make a right.
#75027
If Raikkonen intentionally crashes into Lewis I would expect McLaren to have ordered Kovalainen to wipe out Massa. You wouldn't see any complaints from any but the most biased Ferrari lambs.


You'd hear complaints from me. Two wrongs certainly don't make a right.


Correct. Here's my armchair strategy, give Lewis a full tank for qualifying and on a 1 stop strategy, that way he ain't going to end up in any tangles for the first few laps
#75042
If Raikkonen intentionally crashes into Lewis I would expect McLaren to have ordered Kovalainen to wipe out Massa. You wouldn't see any complaints from any but the most biased Ferrari lambs.


You'd hear complaints from me. Two wrongs certainly don't make a right.


Correct. Here's my armchair strategy, give Lewis a full tank for qualifying and on a 1 stop strategy, that way he ain't going to end up in any tangles for the first few laps


Risky he might be too slow if other cars are light.

They'll probably just do a longer 1st stint then a shorter stint.

he'll qualify 2nd or 3rd i expect nice and safe the ferrari's can drive off into the distance hopfully kovi will be behind him to keep alonso off him.
#75089
I think they should fuel Kovalainen light and give him at least some chance of some more glory in the last race of the season and if Lewis gets ahead of Massa too, alow Kovalainen to pull off into the distance and this would seriously unnerve Massa.
#75094
I think they should fuel Kovalainen light and give him at least some chance of some more glory in the last race of the season and if Lewis gets ahead of Massa too, alow Kovalainen to pull off into the distance and this would seriously unnerve Massa.


Or, if necessary, hold Massa back? If Kovalainen starts ahead of Felipe, he can hold him up for a whole stint (although, Massa does have a spectacular way around Interlagos).
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 12

See our F1 related articles too!