FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[bud]

been lucky??? either you dont follow F1 much or is blind because its common knowledge he is classed as one of the most unlucky drivers on the grid!

SO last race....that was luck to get pole.....I think Nico deserved more, he got the right tyre @ the right time....

Luck to get pole??? what a crock of s***! having the guts to go on inters is not luck! Run along VB youre just trolling right now with alot of crap.... less is more!

So out of Alonso or Webber, who is better?

WTF
whats that got to do with anything?

[Jamie]

been lucky??? either you dont follow F1 much or is blind because its common knowledge he is classed as one of the most unlucky drivers on the grid!

SO last race....that was luck to get pole.....I think Nico deserved more, he got the right tyre @ the right time....

Luck to get pole??? what a crock of s***! having the guts to go on inters is not luck! Run along VB youre just trolling right now with alot of crap.... less is more!

So out of Alonso or Webber, who is better?

WTF
whats that got to do with anything?

Answer the question.....A comparison...Alonso is better, the only reason Webber is good is due to RBR. Not him, end off. That's what I'm making the point of, no need for swearing. He's over rated and i don't think any man with half a brain would miss him...K?

[bud]

i dont understand why you brought Alonso into this... who has said Webber is better????

and youre a moron where have you been since 03? Marks done alot of good things in shitty cars only the last two years he has a race winning car and guess what, he has won races so back off and go watch your MotoGP because you dont have a friggen clue!

[antoniob]

i dont understand why you brought Alonso into this... who has said Webber is better????

and youre a moron where have you been since 03? Marks done alot of good things in shitty cars only the last two years he has a race winning car and guess what, he has won races so back off and go watch your MotoGP because you dont have a friggen clue!

Well said Bud !

[texasmr2]

As Alonso is mentioned in 99.99% of his post even if the topic of discussion is about the moon .

[stonemonkey]

:yes:
As Alonso is mentioned in 99.99% of his post even if the topic of discussion is about the moon .

Well, Alonso is better than Armstrong.

[EwanM]

DRUNK

[suitcase]

:yes:
As Alonso is mentioned in 99.99% of his post even if the topic of discussion is about the moon .

Well, Alonso is better than Armstrong.

I would say it depends on the occupation.

[7UpJordan]

:yes:
As Alonso is mentioned in 99.99% of his post even if the topic of discussion is about the moon .

Well, Alonso is better than Armstrong.

I would say it depends on the occupation.

"One small step for TOMA!, one giant leap for Maximum."

[darwin dali]

:yes:
As Alonso is mentioned in 99.99% of his post even if the topic of discussion is about the moon .

Well, Alonso is better than Armstrong.

I would say it depends on the occupation.

"One small step for TOMA!, one giant leap for Maximum."

[youtube]vITJdaJ4xxM[/youtube]

[Jamie]

i dont understand why you brought Alonso into this... who has said Webber is better????

and youre a moron where have you been since 03? Marks done alot of good things in shitty cars only the last two years he has a race winning car and guess what, he has won races so back off and go watch your MotoGP because you dont have a friggen clue!

Well said Bud !

[Hexagram]

Webber is not overrated at all. After all his bad luck throughout his career he has got some good luck by ending up in a team that are one of the best.

He is however sloppy at times and over aggressive but I like that, it makes for good racing.

I always remember him getting 5th in his first race in F1 and then in his second season nearly getting pole for Jaguar at Brazil I think, that car was crap but he made it work.

[Jamie]

Webber is not overrated at all. After all his bad luck throughout his career he has got some good luck by ending up in a team that are one of the best.

He is however sloppy at times and over aggressive but I like that, it makes for good racing.

I always remember him getting 5th in his first race in F1 and then in his second season nearly getting pole for Jaguar at Brazil I think, that car was crap but he made it work.

Spot on, i just think that there are different types of drivers...He is like Sato in many ways

[bud]

Webber is not overrated at all. After all his bad luck throughout his career he has got some good luck by ending up in a team that are one of the best.

He is however sloppy at times and over aggressive but I like that, it makes for good racing.

I always remember him getting 5th in his first race in F1 and then in his second season nearly getting pole for Jaguar at Brazil I think, that car was crap but he made it work.

Spot on, i just think that there are different types of drivers...He is like Sato in many ways

[Hexagram]

Spot on, i just think that there are different types of drivers...He is like Sato in many ways

Button destroyed Sato in 2005, that would never happen to Webber. So I would not compare Sato and Webber or even say they are alike mate.

Edit: I see where you are coming from with Webber's first points at his home GP in his first season and Sato's at his home GP at his first season. Also how they are both aggressive but Sato's points came at the end of a terrible debut season in a Jordan which was much better than the Minardi.

Also Webber's aggression tends to work for him where Sato's never did. Even as recent as the opening race of the Indy season Sato caused a huge pile up in the first corner. Webber would never do that.