FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[racechick]

Yup i'm 21 but I know my sh*t when it comes to the history of F1. If Ham Boy becomes even better than he already is and precedes to dominate, I will be happy to watch him do so, despite the fact that I am very far from being a fan of his. All I really want is to see the best driver in a particular season win that year's WDC

Cant argue with that! Wish I was 21!!!

[Gilles 27]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

[Tony_sa]

no offense taken mate, I was just posturing

[Hanwombat]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

21 is a good age isnt it

[billindenver]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

21 is a good age isnt it

If I had to choose an age to go back to, it would be 28. Old enough to know the score, young enough not to care. 21 though? Don't get me wrong, I had a blast...but not really my thing. At the time I was wearing green and shooting people for a living so maybe 21 is more fun for others. After that was college, which again...big fun. But after college, when I had a couple of bucks to call my own...that was when life really became fun. See the world, start a bucket list and get moving on it.....yup...28

[racechick]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

Theres something very attractive about illegality

[cap-dude]

Oh, going back to overtaking and increasing braking distances. I believe the purposed rules for 2010 included unlimited rev's. So couldn't the cars reach higher speeds that way. Higher straight line speeds = sooner braking. I think more aero restrictions could be set in place as well couldn't they.

But also, ground effects. They were banned because the cars were corning to fast, and it was creating more accidents. But today the cars corner that fast anyway, and the cars and circuits are so much safer as well. Couldn't a few standard or restricted ground effects reduce turbulence.

[racechick]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

21 is a good age isnt it

If I had to choose an age to go back to, it would be 28. Old enough to know the score, young enough not to care. 21 though? Don't get me wrong, I had a blast...but not really my thing. At the time I was wearing green and shooting people for a living so maybe 21 is more fun for others. After that was college, which again...big fun. But after college, when I had a couple of bucks to call my own...that was when life really became fun. See the world, start a bucket list and get moving on it.....yup...28

So how old are you??

[Tony_sa]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

Theres something very attractive about illegality

like maybe being caught doing what you shouldnt be doing ??

[racechick]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

Theres something very attractive about illegality

like maybe being caught doing what you shouldnt be doing ??

[Tony_sa]

eh it's alright, i seem to remember being 17 was pretty good though - illegally

Theres something very attractive about illegality

like maybe being caught doing what you shouldnt be doing ??

naughty naughty .. but fun.!! OMG !!

[FerrariFan63]

Oh, going back to overtaking and increasing braking distances. I believe the purposed rules for 2010 included unlimited rev's. So couldn't the cars reach higher speeds that way. Higher straight line speeds = sooner braking. I think more aero restrictions could be set in place as well couldn't they.

Maybe the FIA will introduce an additional brake that can only be used once a lap. To "enhance overtaking".

[Tony_sa]

Oh, going back to overtaking and increasing braking distances. I believe the purposed rules for 2010 included unlimited rev's. So couldn't the cars reach higher speeds that way. Higher straight line speeds = sooner braking. I think more aero restrictions could be set in place as well couldn't they.

Maybe the FIA will introduce an additional brake that can only be used once a lap. To "enhance overtaking".

ja - and maybe if they slingshot around the moon they will gain enuff speed to overtake .. what the heck are they thinking. maybe they should stop trying to control the damn races. The teams need the freedom to try any s*** they want in order to win. death to max and bernie. !!! erm sorry .. wrong call i guess.

[FerrariFan63]

ja - and maybe if they slingshot around the moon they will gain enuff speed to overtake .. what the heck are they thinking. maybe they should stop trying to control the damn races. The teams need the freedom to try any s*** they want in order to win. death to max and bernie. !!! erm sorry .. wrong call i guess.

How about making them six wheeled cars, but the extra pair of wheels can only be lowered down onto the track for a maximum of ten seconds a lap?

[darwin dali]

Most seasons that I remember have had a dominant team, whether it be Ferrari/McLaren/Williams etc. Sometimes the dominance is due to the cars, and sometimes the drivers (although the car helps lol)

For me it is not boring, this season is a fairlytale season for a team that was as good as out of F1.

If Button wins, it will be way better than Hamiltons title.

WW

Agreed - I just sit back and enjoy the races and the results, whatever they might be. It's way less stressful this way and more enjoyable than when having a dog in the race.