Bootstrap Framework 3.3.6

Over a dozen reusable components built to provide iconography, dropdowns, input groups, navigation, alerts, and much more...

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By racechick
#418732
Stop changing the subject when your losing! And what am I apologising for? :shrug::fishslap:


you're*


Correct. Good spot. And is that it as far as your answer goes? :hehe:
User avatar
By geetface9
#418739
Stop changing the subject when your losing! And what am I apologising for? :shrug::fishslap:


you're*


Correct. Good spot. And is that it as far as your answer goes? :hehe:


NOPE!! Idk how you quantify losing but saying somebody is incapable of lying means you've already 'lost' since that's not even possible. Research shows that humans on average tell 10 lies a day and the people they lie to the most are those closest to them.
By Hammer278
#418740
There's no way to prove either way, so why argue the point at all?

How does Lewis cheating on Nicole reflect on him as a driver anyway? If the answer is no reflection, it's a pretty dumb point to bring up in the first place dontcha agree. :confused:
User avatar
By geetface9
#418742
There's no way to prove either way, so why argue the point at all?

How does Lewis cheating on Nicole reflect on him as a driver anyway? If the answer is no reflection, it's a pretty dumb point to bring up in the first place dontcha agree. :confused:


The only reason I'm arguing the point is cuz RC came in saying "lewis doesn't do that. we've already had this discussion" as if her word was fact, so I'm disputing it. And I don't think I've mentioned anything about his dating situation reflecting on him as a driver so I've got no reason to speak on that, so Idk what you're referring to as dumb unless it's your bringing up a point that nobody is talking about :confused:
By Hammer278
#418746
Oh yes...I thought this whole time we're in the Lewis VS Nico(le) thread. :rofl::rofl:

My bad. Let's continue assessing Hamilton's % chance of infidelity. :thumbup:
User avatar
By racechick
#418772
30% chance eh. Well you've certainly downgraded from " he has some some" :thumbup:
User avatar
By racechick
#418775
:yikes:
User avatar
By geetface9
#418803
30% chance eh. Well you've certainly downgraded from " he has some some" :thumbup:


I hope he does! scherzinger ain't got much on her :rofl: not for $44 million :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
By Hammer278
#418804
30% chance eh. Well you've certainly downgraded from " he has some some" :thumbup:


I hope he does! scherzinger ain't got much on her :rofl: not for $44 million :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:


Taking this a bit off topic, but have you ever seen Hugh Jackman's wife?
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!