F1 and Motorsport Forums
racechick wrote:Stop changing the subject when your losing! And what am I apologising for?you're*
geetface9 wrote:Correct. Good spot. And is that it as far as your answer goes?racechick wrote:Stop changing the subject when your losing! And what am I apologising for?you're*
racechick wrote:NOPE!! Idk how you quantify losing but saying somebody is incapable of lying means you've already 'lost' since that's not even possible. Research shows that humans on average tell 10 lies a day and the people they lie to the most are those closest to them.geetface9 wrote:Correct. Good spot. And is that it as far as your answer goes?racechick wrote:Stop changing the subject when your losing! And what am I apologising for?you're*
Hammer278 wrote:There's no way to prove either way, so why argue the point at all?The only reason I'm arguing the point is cuz RC came in saying "lewis doesn't do that. we've already had this discussion" as if her word was fact, so I'm disputing it. And I don't think I've mentioned anything about his dating situation reflecting on him as a driver so I've got no reason to speak on that, so Idk what you're referring to as dumb unless it's your bringing up a point that nobody is talking about
How does Lewis cheating on Nicole reflect on him as a driver anyway? If the answer is no reflection, it's a pretty dumb point to bring up in the first place dontcha agree.
What's Burning? wrote:Three ways don't count.
They count double 
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
racechick wrote:30% chance eh. Well you've certainly downgraded from " he has some some"I hope he does! scherzinger ain't got much on her
not for $44 million geetface9 wrote:Taking this a bit off topic, but have you ever seen Hugh Jackman's wife?racechick wrote:30% chance eh. Well you've certainly downgraded from " he has some some"I hope he does! scherzinger ain't got much on her
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!
- By hass25