You do know you can call a man disturbingly good looking and not be homosexual?
I personally think Justin Timberlake or Bradley Cooper are disturbingly good looking. And I'm not homosexual.
I dont find people who have facial hair, muscles, testosterone attractive. Some might be less painful on the eye but not interesting or attractive or disturbing in any way whatsoever.
I just dont see the attraction in something thats completely known, only in something different and visually and mentally different.
You are either physically attracted (disturbed) to something or you are completely indifferent. Thats different to saying 'Justin timber is good looking' saying 'Justin I find attractive to me, I find disturbs me because I get a feeling'
heres the test, like the 'foot massage' scene in Pulp Fiction - say you were at a Sheep show in Wales, and you had 2 sheep in the final, you could probably say sheep a was easier on the eye than sheep b. But would you say you found sheep disturbingly attractive? Would a sheep farmer who found one of his sheep disturbingly attractive be a good boss?
No one should be judged by what arouses feelings in them, thats just how things work. However if you are saying that Justin stirs certain feelings or you find him physically and 'movingly' attractive, then I suggest you start to listen to your feelings more and be true to yourself
