- 14 Mar 13, 23:20#349682Yes Jenson is entitled to his opinion, as is Lewis, but Jenson contradicts himself. He refutes Lewis' statement about McLaren being too restrictive by saying he has 'phenomenal freedom'. He then goes on to say how much sponsor work there is to do.
Jenson may have a point,the sponsor work is necessary for Mclaren, so why refute Lewis' comment and call I a criticism of Mclaren? It wasn't, it was stating the same point Jenson was making.
I just don't see it as a contradiction. Having freedom and having sponsor commitments are not mutually exclusive nor solely reliant on each other. For example - freedom could mean many things at a F1 team - it could mean not too many restrictions placed on extra-curricular activities, more input into the development of the car, more input into the strategy, guaranteed time off at certain points in the year - even if busy at others etc.
In fact, in most areas of life, greater freedom comes with the acceptance of greater responsibilities and the two actually can go hand in hand as opposed to being a contradiction. It's not always so black and white, and perhaps not so to base perceived freedom solely on specific work or sponsor commitments.
Of course that's just how I personally see it.
Favourite racing series: F1, Indycar, NASCAR, GP2, F3, Formula E, Trophee Andros, DTM, WTCC, BTCC, World Endurance... etc. etc.