- 19 Aug 14, 00:11#413160
Yes you miss something.
Hamilton is the only driver in F1 history to have won races in every year he's been in the sport. In quite a few of those years, he's put dogs on the podium sometimes even on the top step. You know, the same thing Alonso does and the Tifosi celebrate that a lot, so I'm sure even you should be able to draw parallels.
Having said that, this year Hamilton's accomplishments have far surpassed those of previous F1 seasons. Although he has become a stronger driver, with each season, how much of this year's unprecedented success is attributable to the Mercedes car he's got under him? Is there any way to separate the success of a specific driver from a specific car in a specific season?
How can you argue that Vettel's success is attributable "only" to the Red Bull; but, then not give credit to the Mercedes machinery?
Since you missed the point entirely, I'll put it another way.
Your garden variety F1 driver should be able to win in a greatly superior car, that's not what's being discussed here. It's the winning in an inferior car that's being questioned. So far Vettel has failed miserably at that. Many of us here predicted he would. None of us here predicted his teammate would be mopping the floor with him.
The question remains. IF you say that "anyone" can win in a greatly superior car,
which Vettel did and only greats should be able to win in inferior cars, which Vettel
obviously isn't, thusfar. What are you then saying about Hamilton, since he didn't
win a title in the "inferior" cars he was previously driving?
Or, am I missing something again?
Yes you miss something.

"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...