FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[bud]

Didnt pay off, Red Bull won (that was the short answer)

By that loigc you could argue Mclaren's driver strategy didn't pay off, as they didn't win either.

Or even Redbull were right to give him Mark's wing in Silverstone, cos he won it in the end

is every answer you give just to turn a comment on its head?

It's a good way of testing if its watertight

McLaren didnt put all eggs in one basket unlike Ferrari so it didnt even make sense.

[vaptin]

And they didn't win either, that's my point, it's just a particular/strategy/tactic to try and maximise your chances. Ferrari put their eggs in one basket plenty of times with Schumacher and I think that worked out quite well.

[bud]

You could point that out to every team on the grid, No one won but Redbull won So whats your point? Again you only turn things around thats all you have.

[vaptin]

You could point that out to every team on the grid, No one won but Redbull won So whats your point? Again you only turn things around thats all you have.

My point being Redbull won mainly because of having the fastest car.

Ferrari weren't wrong to favour Alonso because they didn't win the WDC in the end. I reckon it had an overall advantage compared to keeping things equal.

If Ferrari are supposed to go, we didn't win the WDC, that was the wrong decision to favour Alonso, are McLaren then not supposed to go, we didn't win the WDC, why did we treat our drivers equally.

[bud]

All RC said was a bit of a rib because favouring one driver still got them no where. Deal with that and move on.

[vaptin]

All RC said was a bit of a rib because favouring one driver still got them no where. Deal with that and move on.

It got them somewhere IMO.

[bud]

All RC said was a bit of a rib because favouring one driver still got them no where. Deal with that and move on.

It got them somewhere IMO.

Yeah 7th place at AD.

[vaptin]

All RC said was a bit of a rib because favouring one driver still got them no where. Deal with that and move on.

It got them somewhere IMO.

Yeah 7th place at AD.

Your just arguing for the sake of arguing. Now explain to me how they got 7th place at Abu Dhabi because they favoured Alonso. Or alternatively, go and explain to me what posessed you to think I was referring to Alonso's 7th place in AD.

Or why his 7th place in AD has been pointed out, but not his wins in Monza, Singapore and South Korea.

[bud]

You dont know when someones taking a jab do you mate

[vaptin]

You dont know when someones taking a jab do you mate

I got you with arguing for the sake of arguing, but I'm a bit pent up that I haven't done my presentation yet.

[bud]

You dont know when someones taking a jab do you mate

I got you with arguing for the sake of arguing, but I'm a bit pent up that I haven't done my presentation yet.

You turning racechicks sarcastic comment around is arguing for the sake of arguing, you just dont get it do you.

[vaptin]

Didn't read them as sarcastic

[bud]

Didn't read them as sarcastic

exactly my point, just as you didnt with mine about finishing 7th at AD.

[texasmr2]

So anyway I think we all would agree that Todt has done alot better than Max had done in his last few years, right?

[spankyham]

So anyway I think we all would agree that Todt has done alot better than Max had done in his last few years, right?

+1