ahhh pathetic and again typical of you 
Have you ever heard of the concept of addressing the discussion at hand instead of just firing off random insults?
Discussion at hand funny you should mention that seeing as the discussion is about Ferrari and NOT McLaren! Where in lies my comment about how pathetic you are! I've said it before your only defence of anything that puts ferrari in a bad light is to turn it around on McLaren! Pathetic
OK, since you clearly weren't able to understand that comment, I'll try to explain it to you in really simple words. However, from past experience, you generally aren't able to understand anything but the most simple and obvious discussion, so I don't have much hope that you will understand this.
First: In this thread people claimed that the Ferrari is "illegal" and therefore that Ferrari is cheating.
I pointed out that the rules do not insist that cars are legal during testing. And so therefore, it cannot be said that Ferrari is cheating. I also pointed out that the Torro Rosso car, being an "interim" car, is also not "legal", but that nobody was getting their knickers in a twist about that.
I then used sarcasm to show how ridiculous the claims of Ferrari "cheating" by not being legal by using the example of McLaren not being legal, of not meeting the minimum weight regulations, before you put the engine in. The point behind this statement, one of the ones that went way over your head, is that there is no legal nor moral expectation that cars are "legal" during the time before they go onto the track to compete. But this is what just went whoosh way over your head, with you completely failing to understand what the point was.
I believe that the vast majority of people on this forum will understand exactly what I wrote, and how it was relevant to the conversation. I'm sorry but I cannot keep my posts simple and straightforward enough so that you can understand them as it would require them to be dumbed down to an excessive degree.
Edit: I've thought of a way of explaining it that you might understand. Consider it to be a
simile. (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simile). Consider that what I've said is "Saying that the Ferrari is 'cheating' by running a car during testing that doesn't meet the regulations
is like saying that McLaren is cheating because their car is too light before they put the engine in." Can you understand that?
Oh and your second post you insult me? Do you have double standards or what?!?!? Haha
Except that the entire point I was making (which as usual went way above your head) was that you
only insulted me, and contributed absolutely nothing to the thread. Here I've first explained why your post shows a fundamental lack of understanding of what has been said, then made the "whoosh" statement.
the consequences for Ferrari are they will be on the back foot having to redevelop their exhaust housing. I have ALREADY stated this in previous posts if you bothered to read 
