FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.

Is there really bias in the FIA?

There is bias in favour of Ferrari
23
38%
There is bias against McLaren
16
27%
There is bias against other teams
4
7%
There is no bias - FIA decisions are generally fair and reasonable
5
8%
There is no bias but FIA decisions are bad and ill-considered
12
20%
User avatar
By FerrariFan63
#64841
Nobody wanted to sponsor them. As a matter of fact, it's a wonder the team struggled on for as long as it did without Gauloises. These things happen from time to time in business. It's not a sign of Prost being a bad businessman or manager.


It doesn't prove it, but it's not exactly a good sign. Now, where is the evidence of Prost being a good businessman or manager?
User avatar
By texasmr2
#64845
Now, where is the evidence of Prost being a good businessman or manager?

I'm not going to bother with looking up info that most likely is not available but Prost starting and running his own F1 would be a great place to start wouldn't you think? Anyway we are once AGAIN getting of the topic at hand wouldn't you agree?
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#64847
Nobody wanted to sponsor them. As a matter of fact, it's a wonder the team struggled on for as long as it did without Gauloises. These things happen from time to time in business. It's not a sign of Prost being a bad businessman or manager.


It doesn't prove it, but it's not exactly a good sign. Now, where is the evidence of Prost being a good businessman or manager?

Hang on a minute. You just criticised Prost for being a poor manager, but have now backtracked on this, and then tried to turn the tables on me again. Nice try. :wavey:

To answer your question, however, I'd say Prost made a pretty good coup in getting an exclusive deal for Peugeot engines from 1998 onwards and signing Trulli (okay, hardly the next Ayrton Senna, but a solid performer).
User avatar
By FerrariFan63
#64849
Now, where is the evidence of Prost being a good businessman or manager?

I'm not going to bother with looking up info that most likely is not available but Prost starting and running his own F1 would be a great place to start wouldn't you think? Anyway we are once AGAIN getting of the topic at hand wouldn't you agree?


If he had started and run the F1 team, and it grew, and he sold it as a going concern, that would be good evidence. But the team died. So I don't think that helps. Signing Trulli was a good step, but signing new, unproven, drivers is not exactly difficult. Minardi had both Trulli and Alonso.
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#64851
So the Peugeot engines were no good, then?
User avatar
By FerrariFan63
#64855
So the Peugeot engines were no good, then?


Obtaining an engine deal is not unusual in F1. Looking at his F1 foray as a whole, it was a failure. The team died. Ferrari blossomed under Todts leadership. There is no comparison.
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#64858
So the Peugeot engines were no good, then?


Obtaining an engine deal is not unusual in F1. Looking at his F1 foray as a whole, it was a failure. The team died. Ferrari blossomed under Todts leadership. There is no comparison.

Getting a good engine deal is tough to come by. Prost's team clearly failed, but there are a number of reasons for that. You can't compare Todt's leadership at Ferrari to Prost's leadership of his eponymously-named team. di Montezemolo was prepared to do whatever it took to bring success back to Ferrari; no expense was spared. It was, therefore, no very tricky for he, Todt and Schumacher to hire a dream team of people, and for Brawn and Byrne to design and develop cars capable of winning races and championships. Prost had to rely on his money to found the team and being able to attract sponsors to keep the team going. There's a big difference, I'm afraid. You'll never convince me that Todt should be the President of the FIA, especially not by using this poor example.
User avatar
By bud
#64879
id like to see Todt create and run successfully his own F1 team before you go and criticize Prost as comparison
User avatar
By FerrariFan63
#64887
id like to see Todt create and run successfully his own F1 team before you go and criticize Prost as comparison


Prost didn't create his team. He took Ligier which had run successfully for decades, renamed it after himself, and killed it off. You can't compare that to someone who took a team that was there or thereabouts, and took it through a hugely successful period. Todt has also managed teams to success in Rally, Hillclimb, and Le Mans. There's utterly no comparison between Todt and Prost, Todt is a whole football team's worth of head and shoulders above Prost.
User avatar
By texasmr2
#64895
id like to see Todt create and run successfully his own F1 team before you go and criticize Prost as comparison


Prost didn't create his team. He took Ligier which had run successfully for decades, renamed it after himself, and killed it off. You can't compare that to someone who took a team that was there or thereabouts, and took it through a hugely successful period. Todt has also managed teams to success in Rally, Hillclimb, and Le Mans. There's utterly no comparison between Todt and Prost, Todt is a whole football team's worth of head and shoulders above Prost.

Ignorance is bliss isn't it?
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#64898
To be honest, I wouldn't give a toss if Todt had a formula to convert lead into gold, he's a Ferrari man, so isn't right for the job.

I move that Ron Dennis should be President of the FIA.
User avatar
By texasmr2
#64899
I move that Ron Dennis should be President of the FIA.

Your not a very good comedian but that is one heck of a punchline!! :wink:
User avatar
By FerrariFan63
#64903
To be honest, I wouldn't give a toss if Todt had a formula to convert lead into gold, he's a Ferrari man, so isn't right for the job.

I move that Ron Dennis should be President of the FIA.


In other words, you have no problem with someone with strong team ties becoming head of the FIA, you just want it to be "your" man.

Ron Dennis could never become head of the FIA. For one thing, nobody would be able to understand a word of anything he said.
User avatar
By McLaren Fan
#64907
To be honest, I wouldn't give a toss if Todt had a formula to convert lead into gold, he's a Ferrari man, so isn't right for the job.

I move that Ron Dennis should be President of the FIA.


In other words, you have no problem with someone with strong team ties becoming head of the FIA, you just want it to be "your" man.

Ron Dennis could never become head of the FIA. For one thing, nobody would be able to understand a word of anything he said.

Well, don't you think Ron Dennis would make a good President? After all, he's got the credentials.
User avatar
By scotty
#64908
There's utterly no comparison between Todt and Prost, Todt is a whole football team's worth of head and shoulders above Prost.


So we've got the former Ferrari F1 boss vs. a 4 time world champion... What is wrong with that matchup?
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 7

See our F1 related articles too!