About Us
Launched in 2005, this website started out as a dedicated F1 forum (hence FORUM…ula1.com) offering debate and banter on all aspects of Formula One and other motorsport categories.
Read moreDiscuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
OMG not another OJ.....
Mike has not attacked me personally so I am one up so to speak and a return would simply even the score, however some of you, well, you must have lost count.
I don't think the mods are here to defend us from every little remark, but see that the traffic is not one way.
I have not see evidence yet that Mike is unduly favoured, he certainly needs a little help as 13 year olds don't have the emotional maturity that we (should) have.
OMG not another OJ.....jesus lord help me!
Mike has not attacked me personally so I am one up so to speak and a return would simply even the score, however some of you, well, you must have lost count.
I don't think the mods are here to defend us from every little remark, but see that the traffic is not one way.
I have not see evidence yet that Mike is unduly favoured, he certainly needs a little help as 13 year olds don't have the emotional maturity that we (should) have.
Mike is apparently in his 40s or 50s! he has been following Ferrari since i was in nappies he rekns!
Irrelevant stuff....
No they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.
ferrari did derserve to win the drivers title as their car won the most races and that had nothing to do with the politicking during the year. As for the WCC well thats open for debate
No they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi. Had Alonso ceded his position then the FIA would have banned McLaren.
And the WCC was won in court
nice pic but that looks like a F2004 to me with Schumacher at the wheel! if you want to make witty chops atleast get your content right!
ferrari did derserve to win the drivers title as their car won the most races and that had nothing to do with the politicking during the year. As for the WCC well thats open for debate
No they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.
what was the illegal ferrari tactic? trying to get justice after Mclaren were caught in possession of their car specs! The FIA had to punish them.
ferrari did derserve to win the drivers title as their car won the most races and that had nothing to do with the politicking during the year. As for the WCC well thats open for debate
No they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.
what was the illegal ferrari tactic? trying to get justice after Mclaren were caught in possession of their car specs! The FIA had to punish them.
I think he's referring to the team orders and having Massa let him pass. TBH.[/i]
What is wrong with playing a team game?!!
What is wrong with playing a team game?!!
No they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.
Its a very contentious issue in my opinion, however I can console myself in thinking that had Ferrari not bothered with the flexi-floor they would still have won anyway. I think it was a better circuit for their car this year. Illegal probably, but I think it only gave them an advantage they didn't need. If it was ever contested I'm sure they will insist that their penalty is a loss in developement time and having to redesign chassis, testing time, etc.
See our F1 related articles too!