- By hass25About FORUMula1.com
F1 and Motorsport Forums
Ron Dennis wrote:oh sorry 737 i must have been mistakenabout mike being 13 ?????
F1 and Motorsport Forums
737flier wrote: OMG not another OJ.....
jesus lord help me!737flier wrote:Mike has not attacked me personally so I am one up so to speak and a return would simply even the score, however some of you, well, you must have lost count.Mike is apparently in his 40s or 50s! he has been following Ferrari since i was in nappies he rekns!
I don't think the mods are here to defend us from every little remark, but see that the traffic is not one way.
I have not see evidence yet that Mike is unduly favoured, he certainly needs a little help as 13 year olds don't have the emotional maturity that we (should) have.
bud wrote:No s*** ......737flier wrote: OMG not another OJ.....737flier wrote:Mike has not attacked me personally so I am one up so to speak and a return would simply even the score, however some of you, well, you must have lost count.Mike is apparently in his 40s or 50s! he has been following Ferrari since i was in nappies he rekns!
I don't think the mods are here to defend us from every little remark, but see that the traffic is not one way.
I have not see evidence yet that Mike is unduly favoured, he certainly needs a little help as 13 year olds don't have the emotional maturity that we (should) have.
Mikep99 wrote:Irrelevant stuff....Mike, there's a well known saying that you should pay heed to. "If there's one thing worse than a sore loser, its a bad winner". Please stop the cringeworthly drivel, its embarrassing to everyone else that genuinely supports Kimi.
Ron Dennis wrote: No they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.Its a very contentious issue in my opinion, however I can console myself in thinking that had Ferrari not bothered with the flexi-floor they would still have won anyway. I think it was a better circuit for their car this year. Illegal probably, but I think it only gave them an advantage they didn't need. If it was ever contested I'm sure they will insist that their penalty is a loss in developement time and having to redesign chassis, testing time, etc.
Ron Dennis wrote:what was the illegal ferrari tactic? trying to get justice after Mclaren were caught in possession of their car specs! The FIA had to punish them.8-ball wrote:ferrari did derserve to win the drivers title as their car won the most races and that had nothing to do with the politicking during the year. As for the WCC well thats open for debateNo they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi. Had Alonso ceded his position then the FIA would have banned McLaren.
And the WCC was won in court
bud wrote:nice pic but that looks like a F2004 to me with Schumacher at the wheel! if you want to make witty chops atleast get your content right!Actually it looks like the 1997 F310, and you're right about Schumacher being at the wheel.
8-ball wrote:I think he's referring to the team orders and having Massa let him pass. TBH.[/i]Ron Dennis wrote:what was the illegal ferrari tactic? trying to get justice after Mclaren were caught in possession of their car specs! The FIA had to punish them.8-ball wrote:ferrari did derserve to win the drivers title as their car won the most races and that had nothing to do with the politicking during the year. As for the WCC well thats open for debateNo they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.
mooker wrote:What is wrong with playing a team game?!! Massa had no chance to win but kimi did so why not help him. just cause LH pisses off FA and can't play the team game doesn't mean that kimi can't.8-ball wrote:I think he's referring to the team orders and having Massa let him pass. TBH.[/i]Ron Dennis wrote:what was the illegal ferrari tactic? trying to get justice after Mclaren were caught in possession of their car specs! The FIA had to punish them.8-ball wrote:ferrari did derserve to win the drivers title as their car won the most races and that had nothing to do with the politicking during the year. As for the WCC well thats open for debateNo they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.
8-ball wrote:What is wrong with playing a team game?!!It contravenes the rules and therefore is considered illegal. Remember McLaren had an FIA official in their pits in Brazil to prevent team games.
What is wrong with playing a team game?!!It is illegal thats why
mooker wrote:Weasel words Mooker. You can't justify premeditated cheating by claiming that it would have made no difference anyway. Your "consolation" is not worth sh*t. " Yes your Honour, I did brutally murder 50 people but, let's face it, they would have eventually died anyway."Ron Dennis wrote: No they did not, they used an illegal tactic to hand it to Kimi.Its a very contentious issue in my opinion, however I can console myself in thinking that had Ferrari not bothered with the flexi-floor they would still have won anyway. I think it was a better circuit for their car this year. Illegal probably, but I think it only gave them an advantage they didn't need. If it was ever contested I'm sure they will insist that their penalty is a loss in developement time and having to redesign chassis, testing time, etc.
Kimi has done it! The youngest ever F1 champion. A[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!