Bootstrap Framework 3.3.6

Over a dozen reusable components built to provide iconography, dropdowns, input groups, navigation, alerts, and much more...

Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

Formula One related discussion.
 Reply
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By zurich_allan
-  01 Nov 13, 22:24#378946
Regarding the clip with Kimi and the child (who he did NOT knock over), that was 100% both the fault and the responsibility of the woman - end of story.

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By LRW
-  01 Nov 13, 23:34#378951
Regarding the clip with Kimi and the child (who he did NOT knock over), that was 100% both the fault and the responsibility of the woman - end of story.


Whilst I agree with you that it was 100% the other women's fault and responsibility, most people in that situation would of stopped to help pick up the screaming child. . . . . (I believe)
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By zurich_allan
-  02 Nov 13, 07:54#378964
Regarding the clip with Kimi and the child (who he did NOT knock over), that was 100% both the fault and the responsibility of the woman - end of story.


Whilst I agree with you that it was 100% the other women's fault and responsibility, most people in that situation would of stopped to help pick up the screaming child. . . . . (I believe)


In general - yes - but it's quite clear in the video that as he looks back immediately after the child has fallen over when he realised what happened ( by which point he was already some yards away), somebody else has already gone to check on the child's boo-boo. The child was not lying on the ground alone. It's different too if it's quite clear what has happened immediately, but as he was clearly already walking quickly, he was already way past the scene by the time he realised what had happened. At that point - it wasn't a question of stopping to help, it would have been a question of going back to help,which really was not necessary, and in fact likely would have validated the horribly selfish woman's behaviour.
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By NHcheese
-  02 Nov 13, 08:06#378965
If I was walking that fast and and that happened I would think "Someone is already helping how nice" I would have done what Kimi did.
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By spankyham
-  02 Nov 13, 12:57#378984
Can anyone confirm if Kimi has been given an old short wheelbase car here while RG has the newer/faster chassis?
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By sagi58
-  02 Nov 13, 16:04#379030
Did you notice he was wearing red overalls at the time?

And??

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for checking on the child, sure, he should have stopped; but, again, we don't know what the context of that clip is, do we?
Not only that; but, when he did glance back, it was to see the woman look at the little one and then continue to chase after him!!
I would say he assumed the child was fine and since she hadn't stopped, why should he?

:D

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By operaman
-  02 Nov 13, 16:08#379032
This (the mother/child thing) happened in what .... 2008??? Why are we even discussing it, when the Vettelheads get all bent out of shape any time the "team orders" thing is mentioned and that happened THIS SEASON!!! :hammer:
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By sagi58
-  02 Nov 13, 16:38#379039
This (the mother/child thing) happened in what .... 2008??? Why are we even discussing it, when the Vettelheads get all bent out of shape any time the "team orders" thing is mentioned and that happened THIS SEASON!!! :hammer:

The video was posted and I commented on the ridiculous amount of flack that Kimi received because of it!! 8-)
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By sagi58
-  02 Nov 13, 16:38#379040
Uhm...
I know not everyone likes them; but...
when did Lotus become "Louts"?? :wink:


I think he meant the louts that own Lotus. You know the ones who won't pay up. :wavey:

:rofl:
User avatar

Re: Raikkonen and Louts' Relationship

By NHcheese
-  02 Nov 13, 16:39#379041
Uhm...
I know not everyone likes them; but...
when did Lotus become "Louts"?? :wink:


I think he meant the louts that own Lotus. You know the ones who won't pay up. :wavey:

:rofl:


The broke people who run the small sports car company.
 Reply
 Return to “General F1 Discussion”
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

READ MORE
Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

READ MORE
Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

READ MORE
Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]

READ MORE

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!

Purchase now

Built to last

Why Would you Settle for Less when you can have More? Do not let other Authors Fool you with Empty Marketing Keywords. FLATBOOTS is what you Deserve. Built to last, Built from Scratch, Nothing Less.

Read more