- 24 Aug 12, 12:53#316941
didn't feel like starting a new thread, but given the news today about Lance Armstrong deciding not to go into arbitration about the most recent of charges against him. I posted this on another forum.
“As a cycling fan, I've always been a fan of Lance. Simply because he brought one of the worlds most popular sports into the limelight in America where previously the sport really didn't have a following outside a core group of fans. There were good American cyclists before Lance. Eric Heiden, Greg LeMonde, but they didn't have the support around them to bring the sport into the limelight.
I say all this because it always was clear to me that Armstrong was using performance enhancing drugs. Why? Because everyone around Lance was using them. ALL of the major General Classification riders that Lance raced against were caught at one time or another doping. Basso, Pantani, Vinokurov, Ullrich, and Americans Landis and Hamilton... all banned at some point. So in a sport where all of the riders in a tour, from the best to the worst, are within a couple of percentage points of each other in their abilities. Drugs, even a .5% gain in your ability to process oxygen and deliver that oxygen to your muscles is a huge advantage!
This comes as no surprise, the sport should continue the relentless chase of athletes that use performance enhancing drugs. It wasn't always the case, there was a business, an industry built around beating the system. WADA began prosecuting doctors, coaches, people in the sport that were enabling the athletes to cheat, and have now taken a hard stance against the athletes themselves.
I'm glad this is over with. Perhaps now the sport I love can move forward.”
"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...