- 12 Nov 10, 15:21#224726
Except it isn't.

Believe what you want if it helps you sleep at night. Im really sick of discussing this topic I think its spans across 4 threads now. End of the day the two examples do not compare to one another, Heikki was not leading a race and the team made him give up the race win. All he did was not fight Lewis for position after his pit stop. Lewis then went on to pass two more cars and take the race win. So i suspect he needed team orders to pass them if Heikki was going to be so hard to pass? You guys are a joke. Bye
You don't need to start crying and start throwing around insults because people don't have the same view as you.
Both were team orders. You can't deny that.
How was Hockenhiem 2008 a team order.
Massa v Alonso Hockenhiem 2010 Massa could and would of won the race.
Hekki could never of won the race and was stopping lewis from reaching 3rd he would of passed Hekki even if he made it hard he just didnt' fight since there was no gain for him really.
Excuse, althought Im not native english I am very familiar with the language, although I don't recognize things like "could of, would of", what the heck is that?
past-tense words for doing things
Lewis would of over taken hekkie - to say he would of passed hekki even if it was made difficult.
Hekki could never of - to say he wasn't able to do somthing such as pass 3 cars and win
ohh, darn, you mean "would have" "could have"... What is this "of" overuse, a new forum trend?
same thing
Except it isn't.

