McLaren - Why Are They In F1? - Page 2

#6827

By Freddie - 10 Apr 07, 18:45

- 10 Apr 07, 18:45#6827

Spot on, Bud

I still think Lewis was blocking the reds, but I also think it was perfectly OK to do that

Just my pathetic 2 cents ;-)

If google made $1 everytime someone used them to find an answer to a tech support question, they would own microsoft.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.racingpickers.com

#6835

By bud - 10 Apr 07, 22:01

- 10 Apr 07, 22:01#6835

its pathetic you fool. i agree .

Exactly dude its pathetic

#6836

By R00DIT - 11 Apr 07, 00:08

- 11 Apr 07, 00:08#6836

and mclaren were so passionate they changed into different clothes for the photocall. give me a break.

#6838

By bud - 11 Apr 07, 00:40

- 11 Apr 07, 00:40#6838

and mclaren were so passionate they changed into different clothes for the photocall. give me a break.

that they did! would you rather them kiss and dry hump each other wearing silly wigs italian style?

#6851

By Red Five - 11 Apr 07, 21:12

- 11 Apr 07, 21:12#6851

I'm with Bud on this one, McLaren have always (in recent history) been quite a serious 'corporate' style team, and their tactics have been no different to that which any other team would use in those circumstances.

But Ron Dennis turning his back on Kimi after the race was childish in the extreme and kind of goes against the McLaren ethos (although it was funny!).

#6927

By McLaren786 - 14 Apr 07, 15:59

- 14 Apr 07, 15:59#6927

Austria 2002 comes to mind really? McLaren have no passion are you joking. Its kindo of like saying that ferrari have passion in their road cars but german supercars like porsche don't therefore why should porsche be in the automotive industry. Ron has an unbelievable amount of passion, i've heard him in interviews saying he wakes up with pain everytime he loses a grand prix. The fact is that mclaren have alot opf passion but also have a very high attention to detail, hence the reason why mclaren have such a corporate image.

Very shocked when i heard that common but iguess you do have a point i mean why should the second most successful team(or most succussful team when you consider the period they were in comptetion) with 149 victories, 122 pole positions, 11 drivers titles and 8 constructors titles be in formula 1. It baffles me. Not!