- 13 Oct 10, 02:40#220119
The team orders thread we are discussing Buttons strategy and accusations of screwing over Button, well screwing over himself it was his call!
F1 and Motorsport Forums
Gaz wrote:Horner just doing his usual pot stirring.Na it still wouldn't have worked. He was over a second a lap off the pace of Alonso & Hamilton after they pitted.
Buttons call, might of worked if he manged to keep his place ahead of Alonso after the start
Hexagram wrote:what stuffed him was the SC at the start. The extra laps of fuel burn helped the guys on the option. If the race started on green then the tyre wear on the green track might have been as anticipated and Buttons pace would have been better.Gaz wrote:Horner just doing his usual pot stirring.Na it still wouldn't have worked. He was over a second a lap off the pace of Alonso & Hamilton after they pitted.
Buttons call, might of worked if he manged to keep his place ahead of Alonso after the start
bud wrote:Ya the SC was a bit of a disaster for his strategy alright. It was out for such a long time.Hexagram wrote:what stuffed him was the SC at the start. The extra laps of fuel burn helped the guys on the option. If the race started on green then the tyre wear on the green track might have been as anticipated and Buttons pace would have been better.Gaz wrote:Horner just doing his usual pot stirring.Na it still wouldn't have worked. He was over a second a lap off the pace of Alonso & Hamilton after they pitted.
Buttons call, might of worked if he manged to keep his place ahead of Alonso after the start
I put 20 bucks on him to win. I was spewing when the SC was called!
Hexagram wrote:But wouldnt the RBs have pulled a larger gap (without the SC)? The difference would have been they would have pitted earlier, but still the laptimes would have been all about the same.bud wrote:what stuffed him was the SC at the start. The extra laps of fuel burn helped the guys on the option. If the race started on green then the tyre wear on the green track might have been as anticipated and Buttons pace would have been better.Ya the SC was a bit of a disaster for his strategy alright. It was out for such a long time.
I put 20 bucks on him to win. I was spewing when the SC was called!
f1ea wrote: But wouldnt the RBs have pulled a larger gap (without the SC)?They burned a bit of fuel off during the SC and werent as heavy as they would have been if there werent a SC. Jensons hope was they would eat into their options and pit at around lap 10 or 12. Didnt happen.
bud wrote:Agreed, the minute the SC came in, his strategy was ruined. I believe the choice of the option tire was made by Jenson.f1ea wrote: But wouldnt the RBs have pulled a larger gap (without the SC)?They burned a bit of fuel off during the SC and werent as heavy as they would have been if there werent a SC. Jensons hope was they would eat into their options and pit at around lap 10 or 12. Didnt happen.
What's Burning? wrote:It's a rookie big boy's comment... says more about who Red Bull sees as their competition.You mean the same guys calling vettel crash kid and making 'cheat' allegations about their front end...
bud wrote:But Jenson would have also been heavier. So no benefit there either.... of course, this is all in hindsight, perhaps Jenson was counting on RB eating the soft tires... but seems they would have lasted more than just 12 laps anyway.f1ea wrote: But wouldnt the RBs have pulled a larger gap (without the SC)?They burned a bit of fuel off during the SC and werent as heavy as they would have been if there werent a SC. Jensons hope was they would eat into their options and pit at around lap 10 or 12. Didnt happen.
f1ea wrote:Hmmm... let's see, both are allegations, yet only side's "the crash kid" and "cheat" have been corroborated by fans other teams and the sporting media... Red Bulls is conjecture on the part of Red Bull.What's Burning? wrote:It's a rookie big boy's comment... says more about who Red Bull sees as their competition.You mean the same guys calling vettel crash kid and making 'cheat' allegations about their front end...
<EDIT> Says more about who is trying to villanize the possible champions (as ussual)
f1ea wrote: You mean the same guys calling vettel crash kid and making 'cheat' allegations about their front end...What are you on about now?
<EDIT> Says more about who is trying to villanize the possible champions (as ussual)
f1ea wrote:But Jenson would have also been heavier. So no benefit there either.... of course, this is all in hindsight, perhaps Jenson was counting on RB eating the soft tires... but seems they would have lasted more than just 12 laps anyway.No, he needed the option guys to burn out their tyres, His was a long first stint he wasnt going to race them on raw pace, just stay close enough and then build a gap once they pitted. A gap that would hopefully have been enough for a pit stip. But the SC period made the option guys go another 7 laps than expected and last longer on the options. Pre race Bridgestone predicted the options would last 12 laps tops on this green race track due to the rain. Having SC period pushed back this window and made their pit window a lot later.
What's Burning? wrote:And yet... "cheat" hasnt been corroborated, by the entity appointed to corroborate...f1ea wrote:Hmmm... let's see, both are allegations, yet only side's "the crash kid" and "cheat" have been corroborated by fans other teams and the sporting media... Red Bulls is conjecture on the part of Red Bull.What's Burning? wrote:It's a rookie big boy's comment... says more about who Red Bull sees as their competition.You mean the same guys calling vettel crash kid and making 'cheat' allegations about their front end...
<EDIT> Says more about who is trying to villanize the possible champions (as ussual)
Occam's razor. But I understand... this is playing in the big leagues.
f1ea wrote:come again?
And yet... "cheat" hasnt been corroborated, by the entity appointed to corroborate...
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!