- 18 Jun 09, 21:07#127535
Thats sort of what i meant. I should have said reduction in costs rather than cap.
No-one disagrees with a cap. The disagreement is with Max's dogmatic way of governing. He is not interested in involving the teams and reaching a satisfactory agreement ( which could easily be done). Its all about Max and power.........So No Max has not got right, he's got it badly wrong!
Yup, with the exception of the first word.... No-one. I disagree with a cap whole heartedly. The racing should certainly be made cheaper...but that is by not changing the rules every year, resulting in untold millions in redesign, not introducing expensive and fairly useless tech that the teams need to spend untold millions developing (KERS), not travelling to countries who have NO interest in racing (if the track sits VACANT for every other weekend of the year...I'm sorry, it's not a racing country)....have two or three races a year in countries who WANT TO SEE RACING and stop forcing the teams to spend so much travelling. There are MANY ways to reduce costs....without putting in an artificial cap which the teams are then forced to find a way to cheat on, etc while the FIA has to spend thousands of hours attempting to enforce, prove cheating, etc. It's a bad joke.

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Abe Lincoln
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln
Abe Lincoln
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln