- 16 Jan 09, 14:35#87974
they do look abit naked with all the winglets missing hey
It's naked. I like it thought
they do look abit naked with all the winglets missing hey

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
It's naked. I like it thought

It's naked. I like it thought
they do look abit naked with all the winglets missing hey

Another fugly car - this year will be hard to watch them monstrosities
It's naked. I like it thought
they do look abit naked with all the winglets missing hey
Who said there was anything wrong with Naked?
Especially when she looks beautiful
I agree though i am biased


The car looks really good. I'm really liking the 2009 cars actually. Well, Toyota excluded.
Anyways, this is an interesting little detail
http://www.formula1.com/photos/597x478/ ... 6jan05.jpg
The exhaust is all covered up. Probably for cleaner air-flow.
Anyways, I think the McLaren is winning in terms of looks. It deffinetly looks more robust than the ferrari. Also, I've only noticed now how thin the ferrari is. The sidepods are all squashed thin.


It's naked. I like it thought
they do look abit naked with all the winglets missing hey
Who said there was anything wrong with Naked?
Especially when she looks beautiful
Exactly! The less "clothes" the better!
BTW I think the cars look fine.



The McLaren is fine as hell. The best looking one so far, so does that mean the Force India will look like this too except of course for the livery?

There are some loopholes in regulations it seems, for the Ferrari and Toyota have managed to fit them as well.


See our F1 related articles too!