- 13 Apr 11, 13:23#250809
I'm critisizing your blatant disregard for f1 in this debate! I've already said who I think is worthy of this title Michael Jordan!
F1 and Motorsport Forums
bud wrote:I'm critisizing your blatant disregard for f1 in this debate! I've already said who I think is worthy of this title Michael Jordan!
FRAFPDD wrote:Do I really need to? He was and still is in a different level to any other ball player and will remain that way, Ali was good in his time but would not win against modern fighters .bud wrote:I'm critisizing your blatant disregard for f1 in this debate! I've already said who I think is worthy of this title Michael Jordan!
you didnt say why you picked michael jordan?
What's Burning? wrote:I don't think it's really a fair and equivalent comparison though, ie comparing long jump to performing a different stroke. Track and field disciplines require fundamentally different physical attributes for success... i'd argue in swimming the only difference in strokes is technique and if you're built correctly then it's far more widely applicable. Not that i'm bagging on Phelps because i do know how good that guy is.scotty wrote:I'm perhaps slightly biased here as i used to sprint at school, but holy crap, Usain Bolt is probably the greatest natural athlete on the planet right now. It is quite staggering to see someone turn up and smash records quite literally at a canter. That said Michael Johnson is the best all time track sprinter in my eyes. I find it harder to compare different eras in other sports though...I get your point and agree that the seemingly effortless performance is staggering, given the chunk of time he took off of a WR. You being biased to sprinters is understandable, we're all going to have our bias. However his performance is limited to two events. Have him run the 400 and then 800 and the hurdles and throw in the long jump and you've got an equivalent Michael Phelps performance.
bud wrote:Yes you do need to, cause you totally ripped off my well-versed point, and didnt provide, and still havent provided any substance to your view? Thats not how you go about debating things?FRAFPDD wrote:Do I really need to? He was and still is in a different level to any other ball player and will remain that way, Ali was good in his time but would not win against modern fighters .bud wrote:I'm critisizing your blatant disregard for f1 in this debate! I've already said who I think is worthy of this title Michael Jordan!
you didnt say why you picked michael jordan?

FRAFPDD wrote:Maybe if you read myvery first post you would understand! Again your dismissal of any F1 driver got me going!bud wrote:Yes you do need to, cause you totally ripped off my well-versed point, and didnt provide, and still havent provided any substance to your view? Thats not how you go about debating things?FRAFPDD wrote:Do I really need to? He was and still is in a different level to any other ball player and will remain that way, Ali was good in his time but would not win against modern fighters .bud wrote:I'm critisizing your blatant disregard for f1 in this debate! I've already said who I think is worthy of this title Michael Jordan!
you didnt say why you picked michael jordan?
bud wrote:FRAFPDD wrote:Maybe if you read myvery first post you would understand! Again your dismissal of any F1 driver got me going!bud wrote:Yes you do need to, cause you totally ripped off my well-versed point, and didnt provide, and still havent provided any substance to your view? Thats not how you go about debating things?FRAFPDD wrote:Do I really need to? He was and still is in a different level to any other ball player and will remain that way, Ali was good in his time but would not win against modern fighters .bud wrote:I'm critisizing your blatant disregard for f1 in this debate! I've already said who I think is worthy of this title Michael Jordan!
you didnt say why you picked michael jordan?
What's Burning? wrote: If you feel the way you feel about this thread bud, why continue to post or respond? You stated it in your first post, nothing else needed to be said.... then again, if you felt its an illogical thread why even respond in the first place? You responding to something you feel is utterly illogical is not logical in itself.as i said fraf saying F1 drivers are ineligible got me going. I hate it when people say motorsport isnt a sport or doesnt require blood sweat and tears dedication hard work to get to the top just like any other sport. Its bullpoo if people think that, especially on a F1 forum of all places. I usually hear that from people who know nothing about motorsports and think the drivers are sitting on their bottom and dont even sweat!
bud wrote:What does my first post say? This topic is illogical! Ffs it's not hard to understand !
bud wrote:Fraf its humorous hearing advice from you just not long after you made a thread telling everyone youre sorry for being argumentative! madre mia
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!