- 26 May 09, 22:47#121680
There's been talk about shortening the races to 200-240 km - not sure what came of that proposal. Fuel tanks will have to increase in size at any rate, by how much will depend on race distance.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
However, I do believe the Brawn would struggle more if the Q3 rules were different. The Brawn is so much better on a heavier fuel load. If Q3 included light fuel runs, then the other cars could get on front of the Brawns and control the race. We need to tell Bernie that, he'd torture the FIA till they changed the rules if knew it would mean Brawn would be less dominant.
Should be the case next year anyway b/c of refueling ban.
yeah about that, are they shortening the races, or like putting in huge fuel tanks or making the engine more efficient?
There's been talk about shortening the races to 200-240 km - not sure what came of that proposal. Fuel tanks will have to increase in size at any rate, by how much will depend on race distance.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 


A yank!!!
Why did you think that?



hi all, im new to these forums but i have been watching f1 for since i was very young. I dont think its getting boring because brawn are doing so well and dominating. I still find it exciting and vettel is good to watch and hamilton is fun, just to see how many cars he can overtake when he is way at the back, also its fun to see what he says after the race eg the car is gay ! lol I think they should not have intorduced Kers, its stupid, i know they use a sytem like that in A1GP and there is more overtaking in that but thats because of the cars and drivers. I think they should scrap it in f1 as the cars using this are to heavy and cannot break as well as the cars running it.