FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[darwin dali]

What a moron! He could have waited another lap and take SV on a straight - SV's supersoft tires were already shot.
And then the fashion RK did try to overtake - almost like DC in his best or worst days. And not leaving any room for SV whatsoever

[racechick]

What a moron! He could have waited another lap and take SV on a straight - SV's supersoft tires were already shot.
And then the fashion RK did try to overtake - almost like DC in his best or worst days. And not leaving any room for SV whatsoever

Yep silly move Robert. YIPPEEE!!

[Rivelution]

What a moron! He could have waited another lap and take SV on a straight - SV's supersoft tires were already shot.
And then the fashion RK did try to overtake - almost like DC in his best or worst days. And not leaving any room for SV whatsoever

I was expecting this from you


So I guess by your logic it was Massa's fault for running into Bourdais at Japan last year, yet you still thought it was Bourdais' fault. Typical fanboy defending their driver.

[Denthúl]

I agree. But SV should get his arse kicked for not pulling over as soon as his left-front wheel was damaged.

[SingaporeSling]

Exactly why in the world couldn't he wait for a better spot, he would have made it anyway. Now both out of points, and funny that in the radio it was Vettel apologizing for his team.

[darwin dali]

What a moron! He could have waited another lap and take SV on a straight - SV's supersoft tires were already shot.
And then the fashion RK did try to overtake - almost like DC in his best or worst days. And not leaving any room for SV whatsoever

I was expecting this from you


So I guess by your logic it was Massa's fault for running into Bourdais at Japan last year, yet you still thought it was Bourdais' fault. Typical fanboy defending their driver.

WTF?
I'm talking about RK making an unnecessary move on SV and taking both out.

[Rivelution]

What a moron! He could have waited another lap and take SV on a straight - SV's supersoft tires were already shot.
And then the fashion RK did try to overtake - almost like DC in his best or worst days. And not leaving any room for SV whatsoever

I was expecting this from you


So I guess by your logic it was Massa's fault for running into Bourdais at Japan last year, yet you still thought it was Bourdais' fault. Typical fanboy defending their driver.

WTF?
I'm talking about RK making an unnecessary move on SV and taking both out.

Yes but you said Kubica left no room for Vettel. Massa left no room for Bourdais and they both hit, yet you still defended Massa. Thats what I'm saying, same situation except of course for the outcome.

[darwin dali]

What a moron! He could have waited another lap and take SV on a straight - SV's supersoft tires were already shot.
And then the fashion RK did try to overtake - almost like DC in his best or worst days. And not leaving any room for SV whatsoever

I was expecting this from you


So I guess by your logic it was Massa's fault for running into Bourdais at Japan last year, yet you still thought it was Bourdais' fault. Typical fanboy defending their driver.

WTF?
I'm talking about RK making an unnecessary move on SV and taking both out.

Yes but you said Kubica left no room for Vettel. Massa left no room for Bourdais and they both hit, yet you still defended Massa. Thats what I'm saying, same situation except of course for the outcome.

No, not quite the same situation - watch the replay. Plus RK had a limping SV in front of him and could have easily passed him on a straight. And the outcome as you said is totally different. But whatever...

[jsonf1]

I would say that the Lamb was Vettel, Kubica was 3x faster then then Vettel and Vettel should just have let him pass. I mean Kubica was obviously fighting for the win with his tires and he could easily have caught up with Button
Well, guess we can just call it racing.........

[Rivelution]

No, not quite the same situation - watch the replay. Plus RK had a limping SV in front of him and could have easily passed him on a straight. And the outcome as you said is totally different. But whatever...

No same situation, but whatever.

[Hexagram]

Its 50/50 for blame there. Neither driver backed down going into the corner, the result was as expected. Two DNFs.

[darwin dali]

I would say that the Lamb was Vettel, Kubica was 3x faster then then Vettel and Vettel should just have let him pass. I mean Kubica was obviously fighting for the win with his tires and he could easily have caught up with Button
Well, guess we can just call it racing.........

That's why it was so moronic of RK to try in that corner rather than on a straight.

[SingaporeSling]

I would say that the Lamb was Vettel, Kubica was 3x faster then then Vettel and Vettel should just have let him pass. I mean Kubica was obviously fighting for the win with his tires and he could easily have caught up with Button
Well, guess we can just call it racing.........

Interesting way of seeing it. If you're so much faster you should overtake without stupid risks. Vettel obviously defends his position, and not going to stop on the grass to give up a position.

[jsonf1]

I would say that the Lamb was Vettel, Kubica was 3x faster then then Vettel and Vettel should just have let him pass. I mean Kubica was obviously fighting for the win with his tires and he could easily have caught up with Button
Well, guess we can just call it racing.........

That's why it was so moronic of RK to try in that corner rather than on a straight.

If you only have a few laps to catch a car AND get by it, then you dont have time to WAIT, you need to react immidetly and that´s what Kubica did......Unfortunently this time it didn´t work out as planned.

[Griff]

What a moron! He could have waited another lap and take SV on a straight - SV's supersoft tires were already shot.
And then the fashion RK did try to overtake - almost like DC in his best or worst days. And not leaving any room for SV whatsoever

Absolutely GUTTED

I would also like to add BARRICHELLO you that first corner collision was stupid, unnecessary and your fault.