FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

Just as it says...
User avatar
By texasmr2
#92030
bud wrote:
texasmr2 wrote:
welshie wrote:
darwin_dali wrote:
welshie wrote:errrmm, I think pretty much all eyes have lenses. :D
No way!
Just an example:
The "pinhole camera" eye was developed as the pit deepened into a cup, then a chamber. By reducing the size of the opening, the organism achieved true imaging, allowing for fine directional sensing and even some shape-sensing. Eyes of this nature are currently found in the nautilus. Lacking a cornea or lens, they provide poor resolution and dim imaging, but are still, for the purpose of vision, a major improvement over the early eyepatches.
There is always one isn't there! And yes I know eyes evolved from photosensitive cells up to what is traditionally thought of as an eye, and that every stage of evolution still exists in nature.

Next time I'll be more specific. Smart arse :rofl:
There is a book turd, sorry I meant nerd, in every group some just hide it better than others, perhaps this is part II of "A Beautiful Mind"? :hehe:
Darwin is a Professor :hehe:
A professor of mistruth's and witchery, off with his head yet not before our 'freaky throwdown' in the Dungeon HEY!!!! :drink::thumbup:
User avatar
By darwin dali
#92034
Longbow wrote:is that its brain you can see then?
Technically eyes are part of the brain ontogenetically - so look into somebody's eyes and you're looking at their brain. :yikes:
Williams Support

It has been a really disappointing season for them[…]

Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!