- 19 Dec 08, 15:15#85375
Correct because normally sponsorship dollars far surpass a driver's yearly wage. A few huge company's CEO's are bypassing their compensation package but they do have even larger yearly stock option's and they are super rich already so their paltry $1-$5M yearly wage is not even missed. Im my era of watching F1 beginning in late '79 or early '80 there are only a few drivers whom I would consider worthy of such a princely sum of $51M per season and they are:
1. Senna.
2. Schumacher.
3. Prost.
4. Lauda.
The drivers wages are obscene. Kimi is one the best drivers in F1 but even he doesn't deserve $51 million a year. First rule of business is when costs are too high you cut the wage bill. Capping wages is the best way and let them rake in sponsorship deals on the side.
Correct because normally sponsorship dollars far surpass a driver's yearly wage. A few huge company's CEO's are bypassing their compensation package but they do have even larger yearly stock option's and they are super rich already so their paltry $1-$5M yearly wage is not even missed. Im my era of watching F1 beginning in late '79 or early '80 there are only a few drivers whom I would consider worthy of such a princely sum of $51M per season and they are:
1. Senna.
2. Schumacher.
3. Prost.
4. Lauda.
"Sanity and happiness are an impossible combination".
Mark Twain
Mark Twain