- 20 Oct 08, 22:08#74774
Well, MS was heads above RB in racing skill, etc. So, one could make the argument that bar any unforeseeable major hiccup, RB never stood a chance to win the championship on merit from the beginning of the season, so focusing on MS as the No. 1 driver from the get go was the right thing to do and should not be ruled against. It's a team sport or else have individual drivers in one-man (or woman) teams!
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
Well put, It's all just a part of "Race Strategy" and shouldn't even be a rule.
In the case of the Austria incident, it very much should be a rule.
It should never be a rule it's absurd and unrealistic.
I'm sorry, but when both drivers have a good chance of winning the championship, it's ridiculous and completely unfair to choose one over the other, which is exactly what Ferrari did. When they lured Barrichello, they'd already decided that if they were to take the championship in 2000, it would be Schumacher and not Barrichello who would win it for them. Same with the next year, and the next, and the next (and the next if they hadn't been so uncompetitive). That is where team orders are unacceptable. I have no quarrel with it when it really is the only realistic option, but the Schumacher/Barrichello (and Schumacher/Irvine) situations were not so. It was already decided before any of the seasons at hand got under way.
Well, MS was heads above RB in racing skill, etc. So, one could make the argument that bar any unforeseeable major hiccup, RB never stood a chance to win the championship on merit from the beginning of the season, so focusing on MS as the No. 1 driver from the get go was the right thing to do and should not be ruled against. It's a team sport or else have individual drivers in one-man (or woman) teams!


