FORUMula1.com

[AKR]

Kovalainen may have just tapped him (thanks to Hamilton's extremely late braking) but Hamilton never touched him. Raikkonen is a liar with no honour.

No his not. Kimi doesn't lie. Just like the fact that he is still the CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION..... I'll say that again in case you didn't hear me the first time.KIMI RAIKKONEN IS STILL THE CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION!

[Gaz]

Kovalainen may have just tapped him (thanks to Hamilton's extremely late braking) but Hamilton never touched him. Raikkonen is a liar with no honour.

No his not. Kimi doesn't lie. Just like the fact that he is still the CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION..... I'll say that again in case you didn't hear me the first time.KIMI RAIKKONEN IS STILL THE CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION!

He is a liar, and hes doing for the benifit of the team. Who cars if he is the current world champion.

Schui won 7 of them and still cheated to get one and try and get another.

[AKR]

Schui won 7 of them and still cheated to get one and try and get another.

The one he so called cheated in was in A Benetton anyway so if you accuse Ferrari for that then you're an...... i wont say it. In 1994 Schmacher should of won anyway because his suspension for 2 races plus the disqualification on the race before the suspension that cause the suspension was total rubbish. Had that not happened, Damon Hill wouldn't of even of been close to winning the total. You just are cut because Damon Hill is British and your countryman lost.

[scotty]

From Massa's onboard camera it sure does look like Kovalainen gave him a bit of a whack i'm not so sure about Hamilton though.

[McLaren Fan]

Kovalainen may have just tapped him (thanks to Hamilton's extremely late braking) but Hamilton never touched him. Raikkonen is a liar with no honour.

No his not. Kimi doesn't lie. Just like the fact that he is still the CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION..... I'll say that again in case you didn't hear me the first time.KIMI RAIKKONEN IS STILL THE CURRENT WORLD CHAMPION!

It doesn't matter who Raikkonen is. He's not telling the truth, so is a liar.

The one he so called cheated in was in A Benetton anyway so if you accuse Ferrari for that then you're an...... i wont say it. In 1994 Schmacher should of won anyway because his suspension for 2 races plus the disqualification on the race before the suspension that cause the suspension was total rubbish. Had that not happened, Damon Hill wouldn't of even of been close to winning the total. You just are cut because Damon Hill is British and your countryman lost.

His car had traction control and his ban was deserved.

[Mary]

neither Hamilton nor Kovalainen hit Raikkonen as far as i can see, i also think that Heikki pushed him off more than Hamilton, Hamilton definately shouldn't have got a penalty.

[f1maniac95]

Kimi Raikkonen is a little liar and trying to help Ferrari by getting Mclaren into trouble.

[jsonf1]

I watched the race again and must be blind i don`t see any Mclaren hit Raikkonen

Obviously you are
Get those glasses and take another look

[Hanwombat]

Heikki hit him that was it, but where else was Heikki to go

[Denthúl]

Heikki hit him that was it, but where else was Heikki to go

It was either where he went, the pit wall, Kimi's car or else Lewis' car. :/

[Hanwombat]

Heikki hit him that was it, but where else was Heikki to go

It was either where he went, the pit wall, Kimi's car or else Lewis' car. :/

Shame it wasn't Massa's, suspension damage baby

[stonemonkey]

Thinking about this some more it looks to me like it's just a bit of mind games between them, Kimis and Massas claims are quite obviously not true and Hamiltons statement that he thinks Massa hit him deliberately is the same. Just my opinion.

On the other hand, I'm still convinced that Kimi made several attempts to take Hamilton (and possibly himself) out of the race at Spa and won't be surprised if something happens between them if they get close enough over the last two races.

[racechick]

Thinking about this some more it looks to me like it's just a bit of mind games between them, Kimis and Massas claims are quite obviously not true and Hamiltons statement that he thinks Massa hit him deliberately is the same. Just my opinion.

On the other hand, I'm still convinced that Kimi made several attempts to take Hamilton (and possibly himself) out of the race at Spa and won't be surprised if something happens between them if they get close enough over the last two races.

I guess Kimi has to make up for his bad performances and thank Ferrari for resigning him somehow

[PJ640]

WATCH THIS!!!!!!!

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oBfRMXLcl ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

about 2:50 into that.

I tried to watch the video, but it looks like Bernie has pulled the vision off of youtube.

[stonemonkey]

WATCH THIS!!!!!!!

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oBfRMXLcl ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

about 2:50 into that.

I tried to watch the video, but it looks like Bernie has pulled the vision off of youtube.

Sorry, it was probably the wrong thread for that anyway, it showed Kimi leaving the pits as Webber came alongside. Kimi cut across in font of Webber who had to give way as he was squeezed on the outside of the corner. Not that there was anything wrong with that as that's what the drivers were told to do before the race. One difference with the Massa-Bourdais incident I suppose is that I don't think Webber was past Kimi at any point but Would Massa have been past Bourdais if Boudais hadn't decided he was going to keep tight to the inside of the corner instead of taking a wider line and cutting in front of Massa which going by the Kimi-Webber incident was the right thing to do. It makes it look like Bourdais was given the penalty for trying to give Massa space instead of cutting across in front of him.