FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[scotty]

I feel like I won the race in Belgium

yeah but he also says this! you read the whole book before you know the story dont you? or do you make conclusions from one chapter?

He doesn't say "Morally, i deserve the title if i finish within 6 points of Massa" does he? Sure, he was the moral victor in Belgium but that doesn't automatically mean he deserves to be champion. He simply says "Morally, I think I deserve the title". It's not difficult to see is it.

[bud]

why bother

if what i say is wrong what is your reasoning for him to say he morally deserves the title?
are you just observing his word for word and taking that as his meaning? what are you a robot ?

[scotty]

What the HELL are you blathering about? He doesn't deserve to win the title just because of Spa, which is what he certainly seems to be insinuating. If he finishes within 6 points of Massa then he is the moral champion, but if that doesn't happen then he won't be the moral champion. Can you understand that premise?

[bud]

What the HELL are you blathering about? He doesn't deserve to win the title just because of Spa, which is what he certainly seems to be insinuating. If he finishes within 6 points of Massa then he is the moral champion, but if that doesn't happen then he won't be the moral champion. Can you understand that premise?

FFS ofcourse i bloody do its what i am bloody saying but just because he didnt SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU does not make his meaning any different to what i have explained already!

[scotty]

Brilliant stuff. I'm not going to assume people mean one thing despite the fact they say another. You can feel free to do that all you want.

[bud]

:rofl:

Brilliant stuff. I'm not going to assume people mean one thing despite the fact they say another. You can feel free to do that all you want.

youre a moron mate you really are for a guy who cant read between the lines youre good at twisting s*** around huh



but sparky you still havent given what you think he means by saying he is the moral winner...

EXPLAIN now!

[scotty]

:rofl:

Brilliant stuff. I'm not going to assume people mean one thing despite the fact they say another. You can feel free to do that all you want.

youre a moron mate you really are for a guy who cant read between the lines youre good at twisting s*** around huh



but sparky you still havent given what you think he means by saying he is the moral winner...

EXPLAIN now!

Ahahaha! Pull your head out of your arse chap!

[bud]

:rofl:

Brilliant stuff. I'm not going to assume people mean one thing despite the fact they say another. You can feel free to do that all you want.

youre a moron mate you really are for a guy who cant read between the lines youre good at twisting s*** around huh



but sparky you still havent given what you think he means by saying he is the moral winner...

EXPLAIN now!

Ahahaha! Pull your head out of your arse chap!

thought so

[racechick]

Six? The difference in points between first and third is only four...

umm she means if he didnt have the Ferrari International Assistance take his win in Spa away from him.
which is what this whole topic is about. he is talking as though he deserved that win and if the appeal is unsuccessful and he loses the title by less than 6 points then he feels he is morally the winner

simple but as usual you get people who take everything he says and twist it to suit their obsessive hatred of the guy

I was talking about the points scored in Spa. Hamilton lost four points to Massa as a result of his 'penalty', not six.

um no can you add?

after the Ferrari International Assistance stepped in

Lewis had a minus of 4 points while Felipe had a plus of 2 thats a 6 point turn around advantage in the championship Felipe.

Doh! Come on Denthul! Do your maths!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Denthúl]

Six? The difference in points between first and third is only four...

umm she means if he didnt have the Ferrari International Assistance take his win in Spa away from him.
which is what this whole topic is about. he is talking as though he deserved that win and if the appeal is unsuccessful and he loses the title by less than 6 points then he feels he is morally the winner

simple but as usual you get people who take everything he says and twist it to suit their obsessive hatred of the guy

I was talking about the points scored in Spa. Hamilton lost four points to Massa as a result of his 'penalty', not six.

um no can you add?

after the Ferrari International Assistance stepped in

Lewis had a minus of 4 points while Felipe had a plus of 2 thats a 6 point turn around advantage in the championship Felipe.

Doh! Come on Denthul! Do your maths!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do your English

Anyway, having spent my entire day staring at things like this:



And this:



I think I'm entitled to make a gaffe or two

[racechick]

What's wrong with my English?? (Which is beside the point anyway)

[Mikep99]

What's wrong with my English?? (Which is beside the point anyway)

It's BIAS

[Denthúl]

What's wrong with my English?? (Which is beside the point anyway)

Only the grammar, actually. I was just taking a light subject-oriented dig.

What's wrong with my English?? (Which is beside the point anyway)

It's BIAS

[racechick]

Cop out!!!

[texasmr2]

If an admin want's to 'unlocked' this farce/playground fight sobeit but this is pathetic.