And I suppose you think Mika drove that McLaren like he thought it was a DTM car?
What did I expect when Hakkinen came back? Pretty much what I saw. Which illustrates what I'm saying - that he'd lost it, "excuse" or no. Tell you what I didn't expect, I didn't expect Michael to come in after retirement and immediately be fastest. Whatever, the point remains that Lewis suggested that McLaren had an option to do the same thing when there is none.
I wasn't surprised that Schumacher was the fastest. He was hardly over the hill when he retired and was only out of Formula 1 for a year or so. Hakkinen may have lost some of his speed, but we'll never know for sure given that he was out of Formula 1 for so long and faffing around with DTM cars. There's just a bit of difference in circumstances.

Ferrari is not a compliment to McLaren or Lewis! Its got nothing to do with McLaren or Lewis! If both disappeared tomorrow Michael would still be at Ferrari.
I know that. Everybody knows that. I suspect what Hamilton meant is that it feels good to be winning races when Ferrari still have Schumacher on board in some capacity. I'm not an admirer of Hamilton's personalty at all, but I think some people are reading far too much into this piece of tabloid journalism. The journalist set his stall out at the very beginning when he said that Hamilton claimed to be as good as Schumacher.
And your little summary of "what Schumacher did at Ferrari" does not even scratch the surface. When Lewis fires the McLaren design and engineering bosses, brings in his own, transforms the team around him, becomes the best car-improver since Lauda and uses it to win him 5 world championships (or, perhaps more accurately, goes to Williams or Honda or Toyota and does that), then perhaps these kinds of comparisons can be made.
Well, it's hardly hard to pick a Formula One dream team with an unlimited budget and Jean Todt having eradicated Ferrari's numerous political problems. Let's see, around 1995 who were the top guys in Formula 1: Ross Brawn and, with the possible exception of Adrian Newey, Rory Byrne. If Ferrari couldn't build and develop a decent car and come up with good race strategies with those guys something would be bloody wrong. The only reason Schumacher didn't come to McLaren in the mid-90s was because Ron Dennis wouldn't give Schumacher
carte blanche in the team. If Schumacher had moved to McLaren under Dennis' terms, I seriously doubt Schumacher would be regarded as such a good car improver and would never have won seven titles. Hamilton is doing all that he in the McLaren setup, which, as I said, is a completely different regime to Ferrari from 1996 to 2006; you can't expect Hamilton to do what Schumacher did.

Ayrton Senna: WDC 1988,
1989, 1990, 1991
McLaren: WCC 1974, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998,
1999, 2007McLaren: WDC 1974, 1976, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2008