FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Dedicated to technical discussion...
#57578
I was referring to Ron Dennis.

Yah I also realized that.



i knew who he was referring to, its called play on words :wink:

I have never seen a 'play on word's' stated like that, my bad.
#57580
And what's this about him being sued for calling an employee gay?

Although I do tend to think RD has tremendous capacity for being a douchebag, this planet is getting pretty sissified. Is Kubica going to sue him for saying he has a big nose next? I thought this kind of crap only happened in America...
#57582
I thought this kind of crap only happened in America...

What an ignorant thing to say! :nono:

I see you have not listed your location which I can only assume is a way of protecting yourself and your country of origin from criticism? :rolleyes:
Last edited by texasmr2 on 27 Jul 08, 16:06, edited 1 time in total.
#57584
I thought this kind of crap only happened in America...

What an ignorant thing to say! :nono:


you dont like any criticism of America hey Tex :hehe:

I dont mind constructive criticism it's the ignorant remark's I dont care for. :wink:
#57595
And what's this about him being sued for calling an employee gay?

Is the same employee who failed to turn up for work, fell asleep on the job, etc. :hehe:

I think you have hit the nail on the head :thumbup:, this post pretty much sum's everything up imo. Has anyone read the FIA rule completely through and if so is 'random' adhered to strictly or is there some underlying wording about inspecting an engine that may seem to have a very noticeable advantage?

I looked up both the sporting and technical regulations and there is no mention of these inspections, other than what is normally done in parc fermé. We have nothing but the FIA's word that these inspections are to carried out at random.
Last edited by McLaren Fan on 28 Jul 08, 21:51, edited 2 times in total.
#57713
You're right, I suppose it would be ignorant to think that there weren't whining pansies all over the world and not just here in the States.

That was basically my whole meaning but I do apologize for being alittle over sensitive. :wink:
#57716
I looked up both the sporting and technical regulations and there is no mention of these inspections, other than what is normally done in parc fermé. We have nothing but the FIA's word that these inspections are to carried out at random.

This inspection to me personaly is very disheartening as to the state of the FIA which is imho strictly due to MM :irked: .
#57749
You watch, the the FIA will cover their backs by choosing to inspect a Williams's Toyota engine next, especially if either Nico or Kazuki go well this weekend (which should be pretty much guaranteed as Hungary is like Monaco).
#57755
I looked up both the sporting and technical regulations and there is no mention of these inspections, other than what is normally done in parc fermé. We have nothing but the FIA's word that these inspections are to carried out at random.

This inspection to me personaly is very disheartening as to the state of the FIA which is imho strictly due to MM :irked: .


But part of the rules this year is the engine freeze, and how else are they going to enforce it and make sure manufactures are playing ball ?
If the rule is there to stop engine development why cant the FIA check the engine to make sure it complys with the regulations- if this happened to anyother driver no one would bat an eyelid but now its a big conspirisy by the FIA.
It makes sense to leave it this long there is no point checking to early development doesnt happen that quick on the engine front so the FIA were right to leave it a few races before starting to check

See our F1 related articles too!