FORUMula1.com

[bud]

Ewan sometimes i want to give blokes the Glaswegian kiss does this mean i am gay?

[EwanM]

Ewan sometimes i want to give blokes the Glaswegian kiss does this mean i am gay?

No, but if you wanna give me one, you've got another thing coming.

I could sit all night and rip into Alonso.
I could do it to anyone (not personally I mean F1 wise)
Instant Karma gonna get you

[bud]

Instant Karma gonna get you

i hear that

[KyrosV]

not if the Karma Police is about...

[EwanM]

Instant Karma gonna get you

i hear that

Exactly. Ferrari Fans embrace Mclaren Fans.
Renault fans come on over and join the fun. BMWer's you're all invited to.

Honda and the rest of you there is always a place for you...

Let's make a pact to try and "Give Peace a Chance"

Loath him or Love him, Hamilton leads the title race... and I find him funny...

[texasmr2]

I thought team order's like that are illegal? I mean all we hear about is how MS gained so much from the team telling Eddie and Ruben's to move over and let Michael pass but now it's a justified move from the McLaren camp?
Talk about calling the kettle black!

PS,
Hey I'm darn good at stirring the pot right?

Heikki wasnt in P1 and Lewis wasnt in P2.... not quite the same

I personaly have no objective to a teammate moving over for his faster teammate regardless of their ontrack position as the team is trying to acquire as many point's as possible. I just find it funny that it's justified for one team but considered an obscene jesture if performed by that team's main rival?

[bud]

I thought team order's like that are illegal? I mean all we hear about is how MS gained so much from the team telling Eddie and Ruben's to move over and let Michael pass but now it's a justified move from the McLaren camp?
Talk about calling the kettle black!

PS,
Hey I'm darn good at stirring the pot right?

Heikki wasnt in P1 and Lewis wasnt in P2.... not quite the same

I personaly have no objective to a teammate moving over for his faster teammate regardless of their ontrack position as the team is trying to acquire as many point's as possible. I just find it funny that it's justified for one team but considered an obscene jesture if performed by that team's main rival?

again its not the same thing as the classic team order case which brought the rule into place to begin with! ie Todt on the radio telling Rubens to slow down and let Michael pass!

heikki was not lapping at Lewis' pace, he would have passed him regardless of how easy he made it so why hold up your team mate? there in lies the difference Heikki did not have to slow down and let Lewis pass. Lewis was faster than Heikki, if Heikki was lapping faster than Lewis then let him pass then yeah id call that team orders!

ahhh im already over trying to explain this simple matter

[texasmr2]

I thought team order's like that are illegal? I mean all we hear about is how MS gained so much from the team telling Eddie and Ruben's to move over and let Michael pass but now it's a justified move from the McLaren camp?
Talk about calling the kettle black!

PS,
Hey I'm darn good at stirring the pot right?

Heikki wasnt in P1 and Lewis wasnt in P2.... not quite the same

I personaly have no objective to a teammate moving over for his faster teammate regardless of their ontrack position as the team is trying to acquire as many point's as possible. I just find it funny that it's justified for one team but considered an obscene jesture if performed by that team's main rival?

again its not the same thing as the classic team order case which brought the rule into place to begin with! ie Todt on the radio telling Rubens to slow down and let Michael pass!

heikki was not lapping at Lewis' pace, he would have passed him regardless of how easy he made it so why hold up your team mate? there in lies the difference Heikki did not have to slow down and let Lewis pass. Lewis was faster than Heikki, if Heikki was lapping faster than Lewis then let him pass then yeah id call that team orders!

ahhh im already over trying to explain this simple matter

Yes bud please stop because I'm frankly getting concerned for your health if you keep beating your head against the wall . We just have different view's so let's just say we agree to disagree ok?

[F1racer]

I thought team order's like that are illegal? I mean all we hear about is how MS gained so much from the team telling Eddie and Ruben's to move over and let Michael pass but now it's a justified move from the McLaren camp?
Talk about calling the kettle black!

PS,
Hey I'm darn good at stirring the pot right?

Heikki wasnt in P1 and Lewis wasnt in P2.... not quite the same

I personaly have no objective to a teammate moving over for his faster teammate regardless of their ontrack position as the team is trying to acquire as many point's as possible. I just find it funny that it's justified for one team but considered an obscene jesture if performed by that team's main rival?

again its not the same thing as the classic team order case which brought the rule into place to begin with! ie Todt on the radio telling Rubens to slow down and let Michael pass!

heikki was not lapping at Lewis' pace, he would have passed him regardless of how easy he made it so why hold up your team mate? there in lies the difference Heikki did not have to slow down and let Lewis pass. Lewis was faster than Heikki, if Heikki was lapping faster than Lewis then let him pass then yeah id call that team orders!

ahhh im already over trying to explain this simple matter

Hiekki didn't slow down? What race did you watch? He almost came to a complete stop! Why hold up a team mate, isn't Mclaren supposed to have equal drivers with no 1 or 2 and thay are free to race? Isn't that what makes Mclaren so much better than Ferrari?

I wonder what it's like to be such a blind fanboy...so Ferrari uses "classic team orders" and Mclaren's team orders are somehow noble and proper? You really are full of

[racechick]

do you really think LH and HK have equal status at mclaren? or equal cars for that matter?

Mclaren are a one man team this season!

Kovalainen and Hamilton do have equal status in the team. Kovalainen and McLaren do have equal cars, equipment and support. Full stop.

Everything bar support, Id agree with. You can't like 2 people exactly the same. It won't stop Ron Dennis and co wanting Heikki to win, and Mclaren do love him. But Hamilton is his protege, i'm sure he'd rather have him as champ

Maybe they do love him, but if heikki were over a second a lap faster than lewis then protege or not heikki would be the one theyd get behind for the title. this is F1 not a cosy love-in.

[McLaren Fan]

Why hold up a team mate, isn't Mclaren supposed to have equal drivers with no 1 or 2 and thay are free to race? Isn't that what makes Mclaren so much better than Ferrari?

I wonder what it's like to be such a blind fanboy...so Ferrari uses "classic team orders" and Mclaren's team orders are somehow noble and proper? You really are full of

This has all been explained before. If you can't see the difference the problem is with you, not McLaren, not bud, or I.

[welshie]

Why hold up a team mate, isn't Mclaren supposed to have equal drivers with no 1 or 2 and thay are free to race? Isn't that what makes Mclaren so much better than Ferrari?

I wonder what it's like to be such a blind fanboy...so Ferrari uses "classic team orders" and Mclaren's team orders are somehow noble and proper? You really are full of

This has all been explained before. If you can't see the difference the problem is with you, not McLaren, not bud, or I.

I concour . . . . motion passed

[Mikep99]

This has all been explained before. If you can't see the difference the problem is with you, not McLaren, not bud, or I.

Really, tell my why "McLaren, bud, or you" have more credibility that the rest of us.

Please I am intrigued.

MF get off your F***ken high horse mate.
But what else can you expect from a McLaren lamb, it just filters down from the top down.

McLaren = Moral crusaders of the world.

[texasmr2]

This has all been explained before. If you can't see the difference the problem is with you, not McLaren, not bud, or I.

Really, tell my why "McLaren, bud, or you" have more credibility that the rest of us.

Please I am intrigued.

MF get off your F***ken high horse mate.
But what else can you expect from a McLaren lamb, it just filters down from the top down.

McLaren = Moral crusaders of the world.

I must agree with that and not as a Ferrari lamb but as a non-McLaren lamb. I'm in no mean's attacking or disrespecting your opinion Chris as you are very open minded I just think that you are justifying a prohibited course of action and using Ferrari's past, which has no relevance now, as a scapegoat.

[bud]

This has all been explained before. If you can't see the difference the problem is with you, not McLaren, not bud, or I.

Really, tell my why "McLaren, bud, or you" have more credibility that the rest of us.

Please I am intrigued.

MF get off your F***ken high horse mate.
But what else can you expect from a McLaren lamb, it just filters down from the top down.

McLaren = Moral crusaders of the world.

its time you got off your high horse mate


this F1racer and anyone else who cant UNDERSTAND SIMPLE PHYSICS of RACING
Heikki did not slow down he was LAPPING SLOWER he was not LAPPING FASTER than Lewis !!!! totally different from being told to pull over when he is lapping equal or faster to his team mate. Lewis showed with his speed by passing Massa and Piquet that he was going to pass Heikki if he put up a fight or made it easy !

and all these Ferrari lambs talking sneaky team orders or what ever else you got coming out your arse why not go download Fuji 07 and see Massa make a miraculous pitstop in the closing stages of the race giving track position to Kimi... nothing wrong with that really it won Kimi the title