Nikon i dont think McLaren had mediocre pace in France, the speed was masked by the penalties! even Ferrari were publicly saying this.
so to have a performance advantage after new developments are tested is not far fetched. though i agree Lewis shouldnt get big headed just yet as the only real basis for judgement will be during a race meet and not a test meet.
yeah but 'hammy' could only get 3rd with a light load in qualy (at france) face it firrari were fast in france, the best mclaren could of got was 3rd and 4th without the penanlties and in my view could of got 3rd and 4th with the penalties if they didnt lose there cool. A drive through (especially in france its maybe only about 10 - 15 seconds) isnt that bad and LH should of got at least maybe 2 or 3 places behind kovi. i dunno what happened...
who are you to use the light fuel load excuse coming from a Renault fan


and ten to 15 seconds are you also factoring into your anti Hamilton propoganda equation traffic fuel strategy out of position etc etc? youre right you do not know what happened

Ferrari might have had a tenth or so on McLaren in France but it is developmentally possible to make gains that put you 2 tenths ahead at the next race. thats what testing is for....
Like i said its promising from McLarens point of view but the race meet is where it counts not test meets. we will soon see