- 14 Dec 14, 16:44#429954
2014 Monster 26x Bookie Mugger
2015, 2016 WDC: LH44
Looking around the forums it appears as though Rons recent statement that Lewis 'had a role' in the triggering of the famous 2007 Alonso implosion has been seized upon by the les knowledgeable Lewis detractors who are jumping up to have a gleeful 'i told you so' or a 'Lewis was favoured after all' are all wishing they hadnt because that route leads to an even bigger respect for Lewis all round prowess over Alonso than they intended
So to avoid other threads getting diverted I will be attempting to educate our own members who 'always knew' something about 2007 but were unable to understand the facts available about the chronology of events. There is nothing more off putting to potential new debaters than pig ignorance.
I will start with the following exchange between a mod and a member on Autosport, to set the tone for the thread
so Rons recent statement is this
So Lewis had a role to play, for me this means, in not softening the blow in driving faster in P1,P2,P3, Q1,Q2,Q3 and the race, and maybe forgetting that he was not in a spec series like GP and so it wasnt the done thing to request equality from the team.
So I say Monaco was the start, Ron called Lewis off, Lewis complained, Alonso was humiliated - theres the immaturity
https://www.auto123.com/en/racing-news/dennis-admits-difficult-relationship-with-alonso?artid=87576
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/andrewbenson/2010/05/alonso_overreaching_in_reargua.html
Now these articles paint a certain picture, however when we look behind the story and see the real facts - its a different story, anyway this is where the fued started and so we need to trace the immaturity from lewis, we can clearly see Alonsos
In this race Lewis had a better strategy, he was carrying more fuel and his graining tyres would resolve and he would get quicker further into the race and the gap Alonso had built would be eaten dutring the extra laps Lewis could put in on lowest fuel - but Ron pitted him for nothing to gift Alonso the win
Lewis was oncourse to beat Alonso till the team pitted him for nothing - FACT
Alonso was first to break team protocols - doing extra Q2 runs to get preferential position for Q3 - FACT
Ron favoured Alonso in Monaco, yet Alonso wanted Ron to contradict Lewis that he didnt - theres the immaturity and the start of the end - these facts are available for F1 lap timings for anyone interested - FACT
more to come
So to avoid other threads getting diverted I will be attempting to educate our own members who 'always knew' something about 2007 but were unable to understand the facts available about the chronology of events. There is nothing more off putting to potential new debaters than pig ignorance.
I will start with the following exchange between a mod and a member on Autosport, to set the tone for the thread
A 2xWDC who blackmails the TP makes way for Kovaleinen and jumps to a team at the back end of the grid. I am really curious, what exactly do you think happened? And this is an internet forum for crying out loud, not a court of law. Why not put forward your opinion if you disagree instead of asking me to lawyer up.
You said he was fired, I have never seen anything saying he was, so back up your statement. This may be a forum but you cannot simply post untruths. I don't have to explain anything YOU made the statement, I challenge it, it's up to you to back it up.
Stop diverting, it's simple, you said he was fired. Supply proof he was.
so Rons recent statement is this
'who struck the first blow' route, actually I would say Lewis had his role to play in starting this process which escalated."
So Lewis had a role to play, for me this means, in not softening the blow in driving faster in P1,P2,P3, Q1,Q2,Q3 and the race, and maybe forgetting that he was not in a spec series like GP and so it wasnt the done thing to request equality from the team.
So I say Monaco was the start, Ron called Lewis off, Lewis complained, Alonso was humiliated - theres the immaturity
https://www.auto123.com/en/racing-news/dennis-admits-difficult-relationship-with-alonso?artid=87576
Dennis admits that Alonso was particularly annoyed after Monaco, when the McLaren boss openly admitted to holding back Lewis Hamilton rather than simply celebrate Alonso's dominant win.
Dennis replied: "I am not perfect. The British press jumped on me, attacked me.
"It was difficult. I had to think about what was best for the team. What was put about in the media did affect our relationship. But we are trying to improve that.
"He absolutely deserved to win in Monaco. He drove one of the best races that I have even seen."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/andrewbenson/2010/05/alonso_overreaching_in_reargua.html
This has never come out before, but it was Dennis's actions after that race that so angered Alonso, and which convinced him the team would always be behind Hamilton and not him. That was the backdrop to the tumultuous fall-out that enveloped McLaren and Alonso as that famous 'spy-gate' summer unfolded.
As a McLaren insider revealed to me: "Fernando won in Monaco fair and square in 2007.
"Lewis was generally quicker through the weekend, but in qualifying Fernando did it and Lewis didn't. Lewis was quicker in the first run but then he made mistakes and Fernando got pole.
"Fernando won the race because he pulled an 11-second gap in the first stint when Lewis had (tyre) graining and after that Fernando was just cruising because we had rear brake issues.
"But after the race, Ron said to Fernando: 'Be nice to Lewis because we had to (pit) stop him early.' And Fernando said: 'What do you mean? I was just cruising.'
"He got very annoyed about that because it was like Ron saying we handed you the victory. Even after that, the relationship was unrecoverable."
Now these articles paint a certain picture, however when we look behind the story and see the real facts - its a different story, anyway this is where the fued started and so we need to trace the immaturity from lewis, we can clearly see Alonsos
In this race Lewis had a better strategy, he was carrying more fuel and his graining tyres would resolve and he would get quicker further into the race and the gap Alonso had built would be eaten dutring the extra laps Lewis could put in on lowest fuel - but Ron pitted him for nothing to gift Alonso the win
Lewis was oncourse to beat Alonso till the team pitted him for nothing - FACT
Alonso was first to break team protocols - doing extra Q2 runs to get preferential position for Q3 - FACT
Ron favoured Alonso in Monaco, yet Alonso wanted Ron to contradict Lewis that he didnt - theres the immaturity and the start of the end - these facts are available for F1 lap timings for anyone interested - FACT
more to come

2014 Monster 26x Bookie Mugger
2015, 2016 WDC: LH44